Earlier quoted context omitted.
Er, why would I write an ad for Kagi? Nothing in it for me! I’m writing up some thoughts having used it for a couple of months. It’s what I do on my blog ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
for that sweet ad revenue
what are you talking about?
Some thoughts on Kagi search after two months
11–15 of 15 posts
Re: Some thoughts on Kagi search after two months
#12Re: Some thoughts on Kagi search after two months
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
Changed the title. Better?
The link is now broken.
Yes, I edited the original post to have a new title which gave it a new URL but I can't edit this submission. I've tried to hide it but I have no idea what that means. I've emailed hn@ycombinator.com to just delete the lot :(
Re: Some thoughts on Kagi search after two months
#14I like kagi, too, but this not a review, is it?
Yeah this is just an ad.
?
Maybe I'm easily deceived, but it looks exactly like what it porports to be to me - thoughts of someone with no affiliation to Kagi apart from being a paid customer after using it for two months.
Given he's used Google since the google.standford.edu days and his opinion of DDG match mine, this was interesting to read:
> search results - easily on-par with Google
Given how Microsoft has failed at that with Bing after 16 years of trying, that's an impressive achievement.
Re: Some thoughts on Kagi search after two months
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah this is just an ad.
? Maybe I'm easily deceived, but it looks exactly like what it porports to be to me - thoughts of someone with no affiliation to Kagi apart from being a paid customer after using it for two months. Given he's used Google since the google.standford.edu days and his opinion of DDG match mine, this was interesting to read: > search results - easily on-par with Google Given how Microsoft has failed at that with Bing afte…
The title used to be "A review of Kagi search", while the article is not at all a review.
OP changed the title but not the article.