Doesn't look like any smart money on this one yet, but there's something bold about it. It's like Nassim Taleb's thing that you hire the ugly surgeon. This is one hideous surgeon. Fraud seems near impossible here. [Edit: a lot of thoughtful responses but downvoting?]
Elizabeth Holmes's partner raises millions for blood-testing startup
11–20 of 79 posts
Re: Elizabeth Holmes's partner raises millions for blood-testing startup
#12She had a recent interview[1] where she claimed she's actively working on her research behind bars and still wants the opportunity to change the world with her invention. This is not a coincidence at all. [ https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=yw_xyGbUNZ0&pp=ygUWZWxpemFiZXR... ]
This would have to factor into any future parole considerations, wouldn’t it?
Re: Elizabeth Holmes's partner raises millions for blood-testing startup
#13Doesn't look like any smart money on this one yet, but there's something bold about it. It's like Nassim Taleb's thing that you hire the ugly surgeon. This is one hideous surgeon. Fraud seems near impossible here. [Edit: a lot of thoughtful responses but downvoting?]
If you see fraud and do not say fraud, you are a fraud.
Re: Elizabeth Holmes's partner raises millions for blood-testing startup
#14Re: Elizabeth Holmes's partner raises millions for blood-testing startup
#15Big "if", I know...
Re: Elizabeth Holmes's partner raises millions for blood-testing startup
#16Doesn't look like any smart money on this one yet, but there's something bold about it. It's like Nassim Taleb's thing that you hire the ugly surgeon. This is one hideous surgeon. Fraud seems near impossible here. [Edit: a lot of thoughtful responses but downvoting?]
This is literally a rule that is entirely dependent on the rule itself not being popular.
Re: Elizabeth Holmes's partner raises millions for blood-testing startup
#17Re: Elizabeth Holmes's partner raises millions for blood-testing startup
#18Re: Elizabeth Holmes's partner raises millions for blood-testing startup
#19I think it's an uncomfortable truth that there was some good in Theranos in terms of the unfulfilled needs of society and the potential of diligent work toward realizing those needs with technology.
I don't know how often it's been said by others, but I often think that Theranos would have had an easier time if they hadn't falsified anything. Faking things takes effort too, and aiming a little lower and being less secretive would have been a better outcome. Maybe a different tack is possible through this reboot.
Mr. Evans' silver spoon is worth $10M, so raising $20M against that in such a fraught area is eye-opening. Whether he sees this as part of Elizabeth's redemption arc or just can't quit the hair of the dog that bit him, I guess we'll see.
Elizabeth Holmes' crime wasn't defrauding people, it was defrauding people richer than her. Change my mind.
Most VC's are taking it in the shorts right now anyway, because they're addicted to free money and there's no more free money, and most of them quite frankly suck at spotting good deals. So for the intrepid souls who cast their lot in with Mr. Evans, maybe only Nixon could go to China, and maybe they'll fare better than the stodgy fat-dumb-and-happy B-tier VC's who are not long for this brave new world anyway.
Re: Elizabeth Holmes's partner raises millions for blood-testing startup
#20Wouldn't a foundational invention like this 20-30 years ago come out of a university lab? It feels like VC funding is not the right vehicle for the kind of development that takes a lot of time and must work the first time. Those VCs are going to be looking for returns.