Vibe coding is definitely problematic for someone who isn't a strong coder, aka me. Recently for fun, I used ChatGPT to code a python script to scrape another news site and render it in the style of HackerNews. It took 21 iterations of code updates to get a working version. It isn't bad but doesn't pull the latest articles (I don't know why) and hell if I could debug it.
Vibe Coding Is Overrated
11–20 of 93 posts
Re: Vibe Coding Is Overrated
#12You must be doing it wrong since Anthropic's CEO has claimed that in 12 months, nearly all code will be written by AI.
Wasn't this 12 months ago?
Similarly ~100% of written word will probably be penned by LLMs soon if not already, but that doesn't necessarily mean the writing is any good, only that LLMs can type really fast for pico-pennies on the dollar.
Re: Vibe Coding Is Overrated
#13Re: Vibe Coding Is Overrated
#14Re: Vibe Coding Is Overrated
#15Re: Vibe Coding Is Overrated
#16I totally agree, most of the time the LLM is printing part of the training data. And what we tend to see are cherry-picked samples.
Re: Vibe Coding Is Overrated
#17I’m using AI to increase my productivity, but whenever I’ve vibe coded (not intentionally, just by getting caught up in the dumb vibes) I’ve regretted it. I’ve ended up with a tangled mess.
Re: Vibe Coding Is Overrated
#18It sorta worked, and sorta didn’t. I’m seeing no evidence that this round is different. LLMs allow coding via natural language and assuming a lot of context that is typical to human conversation, but a lot of coding is delving into nuance, which is going to be work, no matter the tool.
Re: Vibe Coding Is Overrated
#19Re: Vibe Coding Is Overrated
#20I have already vibe-coded countless number of scripts and two side projects that were on my "list" for years, these projects would have never seen the light of day if not for Cursor. That's the whole point.