Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

VMOS – Virtual Android on Android

vmos.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

11–20 of 23 posts

Re: VMOS – Virtual Android on Android

#11

Post by alerighi »

fmajid wrote: post #4
outadoc wrote: post #2

> Two Accounts Online > Running two social accounts;Dealing with life and work in one device... Work profiles and user accounts are a thing on Android, I'm not sure why that's the first bullet point.

Neither work profiles nor this will protect you if your device is subpoenaed. That’s why I have two separate physical devices (well, 4 if you include laptops). You should never mix work and personal devices.

Fine, if they are company provided. But I will not buy a phone (and SIM card) myself for work usage. When I possibly can I make calls with the work landline phone, but it's not always possible (or I have to have customers send me messages on WhatsApp etc) so I use my personal phone.

Not something I like since there are customer that calls you even outside office hours (but I just block that calls).

Re: VMOS – Virtual Android on Android

#13

Post by archargelod »

ac_15 wrote: post #12

why not use profiles provided by android?

This can emulate (more like chroot) older Android versions.

I remember using it to run some Lolipop (Android 5) games that are no longer working since Android 7-9.

Some people use VMOS to sandbox apps that require google services, so their main Phone OS stays clean from this garbage.

Also, since Huawei is famously prohibited from using google services on their devices, Huawei users often use VMOS to circumvent this restriction for selected apps that wont work without GMS.

Re: VMOS – Virtual Android on Android

#14

Post by gus_massa »

eniac111 wrote: post #8

From the GitHub README: "If you use the VMOS Pro Android 5.1 ROM for internal use, commercial profit or uploading to the app market without authorization, we will collect evidence and report to the police (copyright infringement) or prosecute. Anyone who reports unauthorized or illegal use of VMOS Pro Android 5.1 ROM code to develop products will be rewarded upon verification. We will keep the identity of the whistle…

The repo has no license, so it's not open source. I think Microsoft Windows has an implicit similar warning.

I'm not sure what this project does exactly. IIRC Android has a mix of GPL for the kernel and Apache for the userspace. If they modify only the Apache part, I think it's legal to release with a proprietary licence.

Re: VMOS – Virtual Android on Android

#15

Post by arghwhat »

ashirviskas wrote: post #5

Inconsistent punctuation; grammar mistakes; copyright @2019 notice on the bottom. I do not trust this a single bit.

The original Chinese website has a more recent 2024 copyright and much more content: https://www.vmos.cn/ - copyright years on websites are completely useless, people should stop doing that.

That repos haven't been pushed in a number of years is slightly supsicious, although they could just have taken things internal.

(Open source licenses do not require pushing to public github, only that someone obtaining the application can also obtain a copy of the source used to make it - can be an inquiry leading to a flashdrive by snailmail.)

Re: VMOS – Virtual Android on Android

#16

Post by gitroom »

Pretty funny seeing all the copyright warnings, can't help but wonder if anyone actually pays attention to those. You think using stuff like VMOS is even worth it when Android already has so many built-in features for separating accounts?

Re: VMOS – Virtual Android on Android

#18

Post by ronsor »

eniac111 wrote: post #8

From the GitHub README: "If you use the VMOS Pro Android 5.1 ROM for internal use, commercial profit or uploading to the app market without authorization, we will collect evidence and report to the police (copyright infringement) or prosecute. Anyone who reports unauthorized or illegal use of VMOS Pro Android 5.1 ROM code to develop products will be rewarded upon verification. We will keep the identity of the whistle…

>Chinese company threatens to prosecute copyright infringement

Ha! What a riot!

Re: VMOS – Virtual Android on Android

#19

Post by indrora »

arghwhat wrote: post #15
ashirviskas wrote: post #5

Inconsistent punctuation; grammar mistakes; copyright @2019 notice on the bottom. I do not trust this a single bit.

The original Chinese website has a more recent 2024 copyright and much more content: https://www.vmos.cn/ - copyright years on websites are completely useless, people should stop doing that. That repos haven't been pushed in a number of years is slightly supsicious, although they could just have taken things internal. (Open source licenses do not require pushing to public github, only that someone obtaining the appli…

Depending on jurisdiction, having a year on your copyright that is correct and accurate is required for maintaining any copyright on that content.

Re: VMOS – Virtual Android on Android

#20

Post by prmoustache »

alerighi wrote: post #11
fmajid wrote: post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Neither work profiles nor this will protect you if your device is subpoenaed. That’s why I have two separate physical devices (well, 4 if you include laptops). You should never mix work and personal devices.

Fine, if they are company provided. But I will not buy a phone (and SIM card) myself for work usage. When I possibly can I make calls with the work landline phone, but it's not always possible (or I have to have customers send me messages on WhatsApp etc) so I use my personal phone. Not something I like since there are customer that calls you even outside office hours (but I just block that calls).

> Fine, if they are company provided.

You have no reason to accept using your personal phone for work if company doesn't provide one anyway.

Post reply on HN