If the ai is smart, why not have it choose the model for the user
OpenAI o3 and o4-mini
11–20 of 527 posts
That’s what GPT-5 was supposed to be (instead of a new base or reasoning model) last Sam updated his plans I thought. Did those change again?
Re: OpenAI o3 and o4-mini
#12Is there a non-obvious reason using something like Python to solve queries requiring calculations was not used from day one with LLMs?
Re: OpenAI o3 and o4-mini
#13Are these available via the API? I'm getting back 'model_not_found' when testing.
Re: OpenAI o3 and o4-mini
#14What is wrong with OpenAI? The naming of their models seems like it is intentionally confusing - maybe to distract from lack of progress? Honestly, I have no idea which model to use for simply everyday tasks anymore.
Re: OpenAI o3 and o4-mini
#15Maybe they should ask the new models to generate a better name for themselves. It's getting quite confusing.
Re: OpenAI o3 and o4-mini
#16Where's the comparison with Gemini 2.5 Pro?
For coding, I like the Aider polyglot benchmark, since it covers multiple programming languages.
Gemini 2.5 Pro got 72.9%
o3 high gets 81.3%, o4-mini high gets 68.9%
Re: OpenAI o3 and o4-mini
#17Not sure what the goal is with Codex CLI. It's not running a local LLM right, just a CLI to make API calls from the terminal?
This might be their answer to claude code more than anything else.
Re: OpenAI o3 and o4-mini
#18I’m not sure I fully understand the rationale of having newer mini versions (eg o3-mini, o4-mini) when previous thinking models (eg o1) and smart non-thinking models (eg gpt-4.1) exist. Does anyone here use these for anything?
I use o3-mini-high in Aider, where I want a model to employ reasoning but not put up with the latency of the non-mini o1.
Re: OpenAI o3 and o4-mini
#19Is there a non-obvious reason using something like Python to solve queries requiring calculations was not used from day one with LLMs?
Because it‘s not a feature of the LLM but the product that is built around it (like ChatGPT).
Re: OpenAI o3 and o4-mini
#20Surprisingly, they didn't provide a comparison to Sonnet 3.7 or Gemini Pro 2.5—probably because, while both are impressive, they're only slightly better by comparison.
Lets see what the pricing looks like.