Instead of getting tangled up in social issues, liberal politicians should be prioritizing housing, infrastructure and government services supporting people's economic activity of all kinds. Delivering better lives for people, and having the courage to stand up to vested interests, from house owners to corporations, would create a huge and lasting political win across a broad section of the electorate.
It always comes back to social issues because some people have a problem with policies that support all kinds of economic activities.
Abundance isn't going to happen unless politicians are scared of the status quo
11–20 of 539 posts
Re: Abundance isn't going to happen unless politicians are scared of the status quo
#12I think the author has it quite backwards, at least as it comes to housing. Politicians are beholden to the members of their district, not would-be members. Sure, more affordable housing would benefit many people, but it wouldn't benefit the members of the district, particularly the wealthy and powerful, since more affordable housing is very nearly equivalent to real estate values decreasing (at the very least, as pe…
Re: Abundance isn't going to happen unless politicians are scared of the status quo
#13This whole thing feels more like its about getting a snappy word out there than anything achievable.
Re: Abundance isn't going to happen unless politicians are scared of the status quo
#14Earlier quoted context omitted.
It always comes back to social issues because some people have a problem with policies that support all kinds of economic activities.
Part of the courage needed is not pandering to the left.
Re: Abundance isn't going to happen unless politicians are scared of the status quo
#15Re: Abundance isn't going to happen unless politicians are scared of the status quo
#16I think the author has it quite backwards, at least as it comes to housing. Politicians are beholden to the members of their district, not would-be members. Sure, more affordable housing would benefit many people, but it wouldn't benefit the members of the district, particularly the wealthy and powerful, since more affordable housing is very nearly equivalent to real estate values decreasing (at the very least, as pe…
Indeed, it seems the real work of politics is convincing someone that what they want is different from what they currently want.
You can use leadership to do bad things, but you can also use leadership to do good things.
Re: Abundance isn't going to happen unless politicians are scared of the status quo
#17Re: Abundance isn't going to happen unless politicians are scared of the status quo
#18I think the author has it quite backwards, at least as it comes to housing. Politicians are beholden to the members of their district, not would-be members. Sure, more affordable housing would benefit many people, but it wouldn't benefit the members of the district, particularly the wealthy and powerful, since more affordable housing is very nearly equivalent to real estate values decreasing (at the very least, as pe…
More abundant housing would be better for society in general, in the long term. But it's definitely true that less abundant housing can be financially superior for existing landowners right now, I don't think anybody really disputes that.
Re: Abundance isn't going to happen unless politicians are scared of the status quo
#19Old people are 'aging in place' instead of cultivating the new generation and it really, really shows
Re: Abundance isn't going to happen unless politicians are scared of the status quo
#20Restrictions on housing expansion are generally very local, with projects being blocked on the municipal level, or on the neighborhood level. But actually, more housing in a neighborhood would tend to benefit homeowners there. As the neighborhood becomes denser, rents might go down, but land values will go up, since a given piece of land can now be used to build a more profitable apartment building.
What is really blocking housing is simply aesthetics, misguided economic and political beliefs, and fear of change.