Earlier quoted context omitted.
> But I know that motorcycles are dangerous. You can try to say that your demographic/etc is more sane, safer, etc, but the same applies to a car and you come out safer. Of course they are, but if you wear gear and don't ride drunk then they go from being an order of magnitude more unsafe to what I would consider a mitigable risk. My point was more that society's prevailing attitude is one of placing blame on prospec…
>In my experience this is rather unusual. I've only ever seen lane restrictions for trucks and even then it's usually for actual trucks, not the quarter-ton Because having heavy trucks clog up the left lane results in less safety because people will instead pass on the right and traffic will generally be less predictable. You can make the same argument about any rolling traffic obstruction but commercial trucks vs no…
This is not the case as less than half as many cars are sold or leased today as the time frame you're talking about [1]. In the same period truck sales and leases have increased by more than half.
> "Why is it a problem now?" seems to be a question that has no flattering answers.
Not sure what you mean by this specifically. It was a problem them and is an even bigger problem now. The vehicles in question use more fuel than cars on average and are substantially deadlier to non-occupants because they keep getting bigger [2]. This is all despite both relative and absolute declines in blue-collar employment in the same period [3]. In short - people are spending increasingly-large sums of money on dangerous, depreciating assets that they have no need for. Every metric involved here is moving in the wrong direction to the detriment of society.
What should be done about this is an open question but I don't think it's controversial to say that it's A Problem.
[1] https://www.bts.gov/content/new-and-used-passenger-car-sales...
[2] https://www.fastcompany.com/91233935/suvs-keep-getting-bigge...
[3] https://cepr.net/publications/the-decline-of-blue-collar-job...