VC-funded startups go out of business. Bootstrapped startups go out of business. While there is a large gap in the two models in terms of finances, operations and everything else, trying to argue that customers should pick your company purely because you haven't raised money shows that you are either deliberately being insincere or know nothing about the industry, neither of which are great selling points. If you wan…
Are you VC-funded? No, we're profitable
11–20 of 43 posts
Re: Are you VC-funded? No, we're profitable
#12Re: Are you VC-funded? No, we're profitable
#13It's a bit of a non sequitur: having a profitable business is ideal but if a startup can grow fast with VC money it can be acquired for 40x (Wiz) - 1000x (WhatsApp) revenue even if not profitable
Re: Are you VC-funded? No, we're profitable
#14It's a bit of a non sequitur: having a profitable business is ideal but if a startup can grow fast with VC money it can be acquired for 40x (Wiz) - 1000x (WhatsApp) revenue even if not profitable
There's people that simply enjoy their company and working in it, they only luck to sell when they are old and there are no great heirs to the business.
And that's true for billion dollar companies too.
Re: Are you VC-funded? No, we're profitable
#15It's a bit of a non sequitur: having a profitable business is ideal but if a startup can grow fast with VC money it can be acquired for 40x (Wiz) - 1000x (WhatsApp) revenue even if not profitable
Re: Are you VC-funded? No, we're profitable
#16It's a bit of a non sequitur: having a profitable business is ideal but if a startup can grow fast with VC money it can be acquired for 40x (Wiz) - 1000x (WhatsApp) revenue even if not profitable
Re: Are you VC-funded? No, we're profitable
#17It's a bit of a non sequitur: having a profitable business is ideal but if a startup can grow fast with VC money it can be acquired for 40x (Wiz) - 1000x (WhatsApp) revenue even if not profitable
Why does it always have to be about maximizing exits at all costs? There's people that simply enjoy their company and working in it, they only luck to sell when they are old and there are no great heirs to the business. And that's true for billion dollar companies too.
Re: Are you VC-funded? No, we're profitable
#18It's a bit of a non sequitur: having a profitable business is ideal but if a startup can grow fast with VC money it can be acquired for 40x (Wiz) - 1000x (WhatsApp) revenue even if not profitable
Why does it always have to be about maximizing exits at all costs? There's people that simply enjoy their company and working in it, they only luck to sell when they are old and there are no great heirs to the business. And that's true for billion dollar companies too.
VC-funded = Full Salary early, network for future jobs if company fails, shortcuts like joining an incubator and selling to your cohort for early sales figures (which can then be used to get more money)
Re: Are you VC-funded? No, we're profitable
#19VC-funded startups go out of business. Bootstrapped startups go out of business. While there is a large gap in the two models in terms of finances, operations and everything else, trying to argue that customers should pick your company purely because you haven't raised money shows that you are either deliberately being insincere or know nothing about the industry, neither of which are great selling points. If you wan…
As a customer, I might be interested to know if a vendor can continue to exist if they achieve only moderate success.
Re: Are you VC-funded? No, we're profitable
#20It's a cute quote, but it seems about 5 years out of date. There was a golden period for a while there that indie hackers and self-funded devs could create a useful product and grow it themselves and could 'beat' VCs. But now you can create some AI generated slop in a day that used to take months. Being an indie hacker used to be a sort of badge of honour, now it's where everyone starts. I think the VC-backed compani…
Yeah, but it won't work. Not a very good look if you're trying to grow your business.