Does anyone else find this article's writing style to have some hints of AI?
Well, the image at the top absolutely is, and the article is written in that AI-favourite list with title headers format. It's also far too wordy. Also the "Alternatives and Tools for Dependency Control" straight up broke and the newlines are literal \n's so whoever posted it didn't proof read it but still took the time to bold the many headers.
Re: Dangerous dependencies in third-party software – the underestimated risk
#11I didn't make it that far into the article before giving up, due to the immense verboseness, but the \n's are a definite giveaway; and right before the first one is also a common "AI-catchphrase": "Let's explore some of these options in greater detail."