DOGE team member alleged involvement with cybercriminals

Post by pvg » Sat, Feb 08, 2025, 8:29 AM UTC

dimaor wrote: post #6

tuatoru wrote: post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This submission has an aspect that is relevant to this community: cybercrime. And Brian Krebs. So it is unlikely to be flagged.[1] Auditing the Pentagon, to take one example that I flagged, has very little tech relevance. This is not a site for discussing politics: read the guidelines. 1. Despite the fact that it is likely to be character assassination, pretending teenage hijinks are somehow a disqualifying for a job…

There is a post which was flagged twice that was submitted by another user. That is the reason I actually found the post and was amazed it was flagged so soon, when I got back to HN post after reading it. (15 minutes). the post does not discuss politics but a certain member of the new team and some of his past, and maybe future. re 1: why would somebody so respected in the cybersec community go after politics all of…