Live data from Hacker News

Why Children's Books?

lrb.co.uk

11–20 of 78 posts

Re: Why Children's Books?

#11

This paywall product must have required a staggering amount of work. And yet, the entire text of the article is right there in the network tab. Why send it over the wire, then try to hide it?

I use Win10, Firefox (latest) and the "Open in Reader View" add-on. So when I right-click the link and select "Open in Reader View" on the menu, it bypasses all the scripts and shows me the full text.

This is how I open 99% of any links on HN or anywhere else (i.e. wanting to read a news article)(I always open in reader view to avoid menus/columns/ads/etc.)

Re: Why Children's Books?

#12

Rarely does an article swing paraphrase by paragraph between interesting analysis and the opposite as much as this. Edit: guilty of my own snark, here is an excerpt from the conclusion that I appreciate: > There’s no doubt that reading for pleasure as a child can change your life. It is a key predictor of economic success later in life. But the main reason to help children seek out books is this: if you cut a person…

That seems a fair assessment to me. The article starts with:

>It is the work of a writer for children to do the same for the world itself. Children have not yet built wide hinterlands: to them, the world is still opaque and full of necessary bewilderment. Those who write for children have the chance to point them towards beauty that they do not yet know exists

I think this is the kind of metaphysical flight of fancies that are not only useless, but lead astray. My observation is the opposite: children find beauty everywhere. Beauty is just the natural state of things. They have not been trained yet to see things from the lens of their own interest, which is the basis for the eye of discrimination. Things that are good for me are beautiful, things that are bad for me are ugly. Children have yet to learn what is good or bad for them.

Then there are the "rules" of children's books... but these have changed a lot in the last century, and most of what the industry takes for granted nowadays would have seemed absurd and laughable to the great authors whose legacy she claims.

Re: Why Children's Books?

#13
> It wasn’t until 1744 that John Newbery published what is generally thought to be the first children’s book: A Little Pretty Pocket-Book, Intended for the Instruction and Amusement of Little Master Tommy and Pretty Miss Polly … The Use of which will infallibly make Tommy a good Boy, and Polly a good Girl.

Noteworthy!! (imho) and you can find the book below.

https://archive.org/details/bim_eighteenth-century_a-little-...

Re: Why Children's Books?

#14
Excellent essay. I hadn’t taken it seriously until I had my own but it’s crazy how variable kids books can be.

The stats at the end about access for the poorest are heart breaking. My son loves his books and it’s so nice to see.

Re: Why Children's Books?

#15
post #12

Rarely does an article swing paraphrase by paragraph between interesting analysis and the opposite as much as this. Edit: guilty of my own snark, here is an excerpt from the conclusion that I appreciate: > There’s no doubt that reading for pleasure as a child can change your life. It is a key predictor of economic success later in life. But the main reason to help children seek out books is this: if you cut a person…

That seems a fair assessment to me. The article starts with: >It is the work of a writer for children to do the same for the world itself. Children have not yet built wide hinterlands: to them, the world is still opaque and full of necessary bewilderment. Those who write for children have the chance to point them towards beauty that they do not yet know exists I think this is the kind of metaphysical flight of fancie…

I feel like you’re agreeing with the author

Re: Why Children's Books?

#17

Excellent essay. I hadn’t taken it seriously until I had my own but it’s crazy how variable kids books can be. The stats at the end about access for the poorest are heart breaking. My son loves his books and it’s so nice to see.

This is why when people talk about Humanitarians, I always rep Dolly Parton as one of the great and humble.

Dolly's 'Imagination Library' is a children's book-gifting program that mails free high-quality, age-appropriate books to children from birth to age five, no matter the family's income.

They gifted 1 million books in its first 8 years. By 2018 they had gifted 100 million.

As of 2024, at least 1 in 7 children in the U.S. were receiving books the Imagination Library; which sends roughly 3 million books to children around the world every month.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dollywood_Foundation#Dolly_Par...

Re: Why Children's Books?

#20
I think she places too much importance on this:

"British children’s books have often taught other truths – that the best thing you can be is white, upper or middle class, and if you are a girl, quiet. "

Firstly, there are many exceptions. For example, Aravis in CS Lewis's The Horse and His Boy is neither white nor remotely quiet - she is aristocratic. The Telmarine descended characters in the later books in the series are (in our terms) mixed race, and this was one of the most successful chidlren's book series ever, written in the 1950s. The Family from One End Street (which i remember reading as a child) was published in 1937 and is about a working class family.

Even Kipling is better than the article gives him credit for "You’re a better man than I am, Gunga Din!"

I think some bias towards middle class[1] characters and settings is inevitable because authors are middle class and write about what they know.

"You can only be a hero, we have told children, if you have that kind of name: names licked clean by kings and queens."

BS, as a non-white kid growing up in 70s and 80s Britain I never felt this. The author thinks people can only identify with characters like themselves, which is condescending.

"That is changing now, albeit slowly: books such as Malorie Blackman’s Pig Heart Boy, Patrice Lawrence’s triumphant People Like Stars and Tola Okogwu’s Onyeka and the Academy of the Sun"

Three British authors!

[1] the British definition of middle class.

Post reply on HN