Live data from Hacker News

Wikenigma – an Encyclopedia of Unknowns

wikenigma.org.uk

11–20 of 47 posts

Re: Wikenigma – an Encyclopedia of Unknowns

#11
post #2

Related: Wikenigma – an encyclopedia of scientific questions with no known answers - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34181165 - Dec 2022 (11 comments) Wikenigma is an encyclopedia for topics with unknown answers - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32210258 - July 2022 (72 comments) (Reposts are fine after a year or so; links to past threads are just to satisfy extra-curious readers)

I also posted it 4 days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42783625

Re: Wikenigma – an Encyclopedia of Unknowns

#12
post #8
post #7

I wonder why Travelling Salesman Problem is included but not other NP-hard problems. https://wikenigma.org.uk/content/computer_science/the_ravell... (The URL really says "ravelling" and not "travelling". Maybe this article was hastily added)

other np-hard problems are not included because you haven't added them to the wiki

To add them to the "wiki", you'd have to be able to edit the wiki. You cannot. I rather wanted to edit the "Liar Paradox" (sic) page, but there doesn't seem to be any way to do so.

Re: Wikenigma – an Encyclopedia of Unknowns

#14
post #11
post #2

Related: Wikenigma – an encyclopedia of scientific questions with no known answers - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34181165 - Dec 2022 (11 comments) Wikenigma is an encyclopedia for topics with unknown answers - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32210258 - July 2022 (72 comments) (Reposts are fine after a year or so; links to past threads are just to satisfy extra-curious readers)

I also posted it 4 days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42783625

Ah yes - and a couple others did in the last week, too. I wonder why!

It's a bit of a lottery which instance of a submission ends up 'winning' a frontpage position. The intention is to build some sort of aggregation mechanism that will involve karma sharing in the future. In the meantime, I guess it does at least even out in the long run if one keeps submitting articles (and thanks for doing that!)

Re: Wikenigma – an Encyclopedia of Unknowns

#16
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

other np-hard problems are not included because you haven't added them to the wiki

To add them to the "wiki", you'd have to be able to edit the wiki. You cannot. I rather wanted to edit the "Liar Paradox" (sic) page, but there doesn't seem to be any way to do so.

rtfm O:-) https://wikenigma.org.uk/info:notes_for_contributors:registr...

Re: Wikenigma – an Encyclopedia of Unknowns

#17
post #14
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I also posted it 4 days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42783625

Ah yes - and a couple others did in the last week, too. I wonder why! It's a bit of a lottery which instance of a submission ends up 'winning' a frontpage position. The intention is to build some sort of aggregation mechanism that will involve karma sharing in the future. In the meantime, I guess it does at least even out in the long run if one keeps submitting articles (and thanks for doing that!)

I'm glad you're thinking about this. It's always strange to search for a topic, and find a dozen hits, most with one post max, and one which went absolutely viral.

In a world where karma/upvotes/etc actually does contribute to reputation, it seems unfair and arbitrary.

Re: Wikenigma – an Encyclopedia of Unknowns

#18
post #7

I wonder why Travelling Salesman Problem is included but not other NP-hard problems. https://wikenigma.org.uk/content/computer_science/the_ravell... (The URL really says "ravelling" and not "travelling". Maybe this article was hastily added)

Maybe they meant to add the np-complete version, in which case, do you really need more than one?

Re: Wikenigma – an Encyclopedia of Unknowns

#20

This is super fun! But I'm not super clear why it's a site of its own, rather than a list on Wikipedia? Surely it's a list as serious as: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_common_misconceptions Or is there something less objective about it?

The “curator’s rationale” page maybe sheds some light on that, indirectly.

That Wikenigma aims to be about “known unknowns” and igniting curiosity. While Wikipedia is about gathering knowledge (“known knowns”). Possibly.

https://wikenigma.org.uk/curators_rationale

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encyclopedia

Although Wikipedia also has articles covering known unknowns.

I guess a reason for having Wilenigma is that it’s a place you can go and explore many different known unknowns without getting sucked into articles about known knowns. Possibly.

For example, both Wikenigma and Wikipedia have features for jumping to a random article. If you are looking specifically for known unknowns, it would be much better to use the link for random article on Wikenigma than on Wikipedia.

I am reminded of an animation I one time saw about a guy that was collecting questions. I can’t find it now, but if anyone knows which one I’m thinking of, please link it. I think watching that short animation illustrates a similar kind of idea to what seems to be the idea behind Wikenigma.

Post reply on HN