The political training in chatgpt has gotten in the way of asking funding and policy questions for basic questions. I gave it a budget and asked it to give me the programs/departments/etc that have little return of value, overruns, possible fraud, spot problems, etc. so I could outsource or combine departments and save money. It went on a long lecture that cutting funding was a horrible thing, and I'm horrible for as…
How would chatgpt be able to spot overruns, fraud, or make a value assessment off of a budget? Unless you provided significantly more information than implied in your post, eg actual spend, the entire exercise was pretty absurd.
This is the biggest danger of LLMs: people assuming that they have some sort of magical super intelligence.