net neutrality briglauer oecd retraction request
The pdf is the #1 result on a well known non-US search engine.
Stopped updating my millions hits/month blogspot after google insisted blogger's content must be hosted on their servers.
Vanished from Google/Bing/LinkedIn: a rebuttal of an anti-net neutrality paper
11–20 of 36 posts
Re: Vanished from Google/Bing/LinkedIn: a rebuttal of an anti-net neutrality paper
#12The author did not compare against the findability of other articles which aren't about net neutrality. So his conclusion that it's about the content of his article isn't supported by his analysis.
The article is not about net-neutrality either, it's about pieces of information silently disappearing from the public internet, without even the authors being notified. The contents of the specific article are not the focus here.
Re: Vanished from Google/Bing/LinkedIn: a rebuttal of an anti-net neutrality paper
#13The author did not compare against the findability of other articles which aren't about net neutrality. So his conclusion that it's about the content of his article isn't supported by his analysis.
Yes, xe did. Xe explicitly compares it to the findability of one of xyr articles that mentions Squid Game.
[deleted]
Re: Vanished from Google/Bing/LinkedIn: a rebuttal of an anti-net neutrality paper
#14net neutrality briglauer oecd retraction request The pdf is the #1 result on a well known non-US search engine. Stopped updating my millions hits/month blogspot after google insisted blogger's content must be hosted on their servers.
yandex? baidu?
Re: Vanished from Google/Bing/LinkedIn: a rebuttal of an anti-net neutrality paper
#15[deleted]
Re: Vanished from Google/Bing/LinkedIn: a rebuttal of an anti-net neutrality paper
#16The author did not compare against the findability of other articles which aren't about net neutrality. So his conclusion that it's about the content of his article isn't supported by his analysis.
Yes, xe did. Xe explicitly compares it to the findability of one of xyr articles that mentions Squid Game.
Should I be worried that people think I'm a bigot if I write "they" about someone I don't know, now?
Re: Vanished from Google/Bing/LinkedIn: a rebuttal of an anti-net neutrality paper
#17This is no surprise. It's what we get with a free market and capitalism driving it: Monopolization. And then we can only access what those mono/oligopolies deem profit increasing or at least not hurting.
How would a regulation be like, that in this case, without significant detriment to investment, makes things better? Because I cannot imagine one (not saying there is not, just that myself cannot find it)
I’m in a context of an super-regulated EU market, where such things still somewhat happen (well even worst, with people having their homes and theirs relatives searched, because he called dumb a politician), bad with the added problems, namely: there can just not exist such a giant in the EU.
Re: Vanished from Google/Bing/LinkedIn: a rebuttal of an anti-net neutrality paper
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, xe did. Xe explicitly compares it to the findability of one of xyr articles that mentions Squid Game.
The author calls himself male https://www.blogger.com/profile/17977561124307072281 Why that made up pronoun?
... and in the context where gender non-indicative well established word 'they' would suffice.
I can see why commenter wouldn't call author 'him'. Why would anyone bother to track authors gender if it's irrelevant for the topic?
Re: Vanished from Google/Bing/LinkedIn: a rebuttal of an anti-net neutrality paper
#19[deleted]
Re: Vanished from Google/Bing/LinkedIn: a rebuttal of an anti-net neutrality paper
#20[deleted]
[dead]