Earlier quoted context omitted.
I actually went to Kunskapsskolan as the equivalent of a High School student. Graduated in 2005. It work out very well for me, the freedom to go about the curriculum at my own pace suited me perfectly. The experience of going there was very much like what you would find at a university. The school demanded a very high level of motivation and discipline. And this makes it problematic, since quite a lot of students at…
Definitely the wrong direction, because it can go wrong on so many ways. Myself I am a victim of for-profit education (well, my spouse is), effectively locked in by contract at a company for 10+ years more. It sounds so good in the beginning, but once you finish your studies and you stand in front of that loong walk...
A new model of school in Sweden
11–20 of 27 posts
Re: A new model of school in Sweden
#12The experiences that were made from privatizing Swedish schools were: * generally worse results and increased inequality * 5 companies dominate the market, and makes huge profits * Sweden has fallen from 3rd to 19th on the PISA test in reading. * huge quality differences between schools * schools have become a "sorting machine" where motivated parents and pupils choose certain schools and avoid other schools. * The e…
Re: A new model of school in Sweden
#13The school system in Sweden is many things (despicable, horrendous, etc etc), but free market it is not. These private schools don't operate on a free market - the government supplies the "customers" (students) under penalty of prison* for the students' parents, for crying out loud. * Or possibly even worse: a student who doesn't go to school is liable to end up in the clutches of the meddling welfare board.
I think I didn't really get this comment. Care to explain further?
These "free market" schools receive payments from the government for each student they have.
The government mandates that everyone attend school between the ages of 7 and 16 (or 6 and 15).
This is not a free market. You cannot have the government create customers like this in a free market.
Re: A new model of school in Sweden
#14The experiences that were made from privatizing Swedish schools were: * generally worse results and increased inequality * 5 companies dominate the market, and makes huge profits * Sweden has fallen from 3rd to 19th on the PISA test in reading. * huge quality differences between schools * schools have become a "sorting machine" where motivated parents and pupils choose certain schools and avoid other schools. * The e…
Re: A new model of school in Sweden
#15The experiences that were made from privatizing Swedish schools were: * generally worse results and increased inequality * 5 companies dominate the market, and makes huge profits * Sweden has fallen from 3rd to 19th on the PISA test in reading. * huge quality differences between schools * schools have become a "sorting machine" where motivated parents and pupils choose certain schools and avoid other schools. * The e…
Can you provide any links?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programme_for_International_Stu... http://www.localschoolsnetwork.org.uk/2011/01/why-gove-no-lo...
Article from Swedish Radio:
http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=2054&...
Report on OECD report:
http://www.antidotenews.org.uk/?p=628&dm_i=LEV,ACD6,33QO...
Mostly it's in Swedish media, though. And what's been most criticized is the ability to extract profit from state funds, given that the biggest independent schools are owned by off-shore VC companies. The situation is similar with Swedish healthcare.
Re: A new model of school in Sweden
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think I didn't really get this comment. Care to explain further?
I'll try, but I don't see how I can make it any simpler. These "free market" schools receive payments from the government for each student they have. The government mandates that everyone attend school between the ages of 7 and 16 (or 6 and 15). This is not a free market. You cannot have the government create customers like this in a free market.
Re: A new model of school in Sweden
#17Re: A new model of school in Sweden
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'll try, but I don't see how I can make it any simpler. These "free market" schools receive payments from the government for each student they have. The government mandates that everyone attend school between the ages of 7 and 16 (or 6 and 15). This is not a free market. You cannot have the government create customers like this in a free market.
That's a BS semantic argument. First off you can be 'home schooled'. Far more importantly the question is does privatizing the school system improve average student performance OR lower costs and the answer is no.
(Not that I think private schooling would be better or cheaper than publicly funded schooling.)
Re: A new model of school in Sweden
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'll try, but I don't see how I can make it any simpler. These "free market" schools receive payments from the government for each student they have. The government mandates that everyone attend school between the ages of 7 and 16 (or 6 and 15). This is not a free market. You cannot have the government create customers like this in a free market.
That's a BS semantic argument. First off you can be 'home schooled'. Far more importantly the question is does privatizing the school system improve average student performance OR lower costs and the answer is no.
I was not debating the efficiency of the private schools visavi public schools. Introducing strawmen is stupid.
Also: home schooling has been illegal in Sweden since 2010.
Re: A new model of school in Sweden
#20The school system in Sweden is many things (despicable, horrendous, etc etc), but free market it is not. These private schools don't operate on a free market - the government supplies the "customers" (students) under penalty of prison* for the students' parents, for crying out loud. * Or possibly even worse: a student who doesn't go to school is liable to end up in the clutches of the meddling welfare board.