Kinda weird. We (Australia) have a new major data breach every month. Seems strange to single out Meta, what about Optus, St Vincent’s, Dymocks, the AFP (!), the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (hardly surpising, with their 1990s website), Pizza Hut, the Royal Women’s Hospital, and about 100 (not hyperbole) others?
Settlement for Australian users impacted by Cambridge Analytica incident
11–20 of 41 posts
Re: Settlement for Australian users impacted by Cambridge Analytica incident
#12Kinda weird. We (Australia) have a new major data breach every month. Seems strange to single out Meta, what about Optus, St Vincent’s, Dymocks, the AFP (!), the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (hardly surpising, with their 1990s website), Pizza Hut, the Royal Women’s Hospital, and about 100 (not hyperbole) others?
We (Australia) have no enforceable privacy legislation. The choice to single out Meta is probably political, though could also be about scale, and being a huge foreign company with deep pockets.
The relevant law had been in force for two decades before facebook ever became relevant.
Re: Settlement for Australian users impacted by Cambridge Analytica incident
#1350 million is chump change for Facebook. In a fair world, we would have competition against facebook and there would be choices for consumers. In this real world we are stuck with the bottom feeders like facebook which just works with impunity. Not only did facebook lose all the data, it disabled customer support chat in Australia for all services including advertising. Our company fb account (for travelers) was disa…
What Facebook did was not about some genius move where they got university students to sign up; it was about making it seem as if your customers are not who they actually are, and by exploiting the market contrary to how it’s supposed to work. Facebook is not the only one who did it, but they are perhaps the first ones who did it for social media and at such scale.
The bright idea of the free market—customers pay for things they get value from, which helps more of these things to exist—is turned on its head and inside out when the product customers pay for is people paying for things while those people are misled into thinking they are being provided a “free product”.
Any value the end user gets from the system is purely incidental. If it is harmful to the end user long-term, that is orthogonal to the bottom line. The company is not incentivized to provide the end user any value, the company is not interested in helping the end user succeed and prosper—rather, the company is incentivized to not let the end user leave in bulk (that would hurt the actual paying customers, that is the advertisers, and the bottom line) and to keep their eyes on the non-product for as long as possible (if riling them up by algorithmically chosen triggering posts works for that purpose, great).
This fosters monopolies, infects capitalism, and when it becomes the default engine of human interaction it infects society.
Re: Settlement for Australian users impacted by Cambridge Analytica incident
#14Re: Settlement for Australian users impacted by Cambridge Analytica incident
#15Re: Settlement for Australian users impacted by Cambridge Analytica incident
#16Re: Settlement for Australian users impacted by Cambridge Analytica incident
#17Kinda weird. We (Australia) have a new major data breach every month. Seems strange to single out Meta, what about Optus, St Vincent’s, Dymocks, the AFP (!), the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (hardly surpising, with their 1990s website), Pizza Hut, the Royal Women’s Hospital, and about 100 (not hyperbole) others?
The Australian government is targeting Meta on a wide range of issues and will keep doing so until they transfer more money to news oligarchs to compensate them for "loss of business model".
I am vehemently against it, but no matter which party you choose to vote for, the result has been the same.
Re: Settlement for Australian users impacted by Cambridge Analytica incident
#18How do you know if a friend installed This is Your Digital Life?
It came back that none of my FB friends had used it for me.
Re: Settlement for Australian users impacted by Cambridge Analytica incident
#19> Individuals should be aware that scammers may use this media release to falsely claim to help them get payments. If you receive a call… I can just imagine the heavy sigh that accompanied the decision to put this at the end of the media release.
I've known this for years, and I suspect like many who find out -- you look for some. Especially ones you had as a kid, that you haven't thought of for years.
Point is, after that you start to look for relatives. Just in case they didn't realise. And while I did not find a person I thought was a relative, they did have the same last name.
So I Googled a bit, found their relative, and called.
The guy started yelling at me first thing. Telling me to go to blazes, and so forth. I just said "YOU contact them, I don't want any part of it! I just hate the idea of $1M sitting in a dormant account!"
Nope. From the sound of the screaming and blathering on the other end of the line, this guy had been beset by endless scammers calling. Repeatedly. All the time. Trying to "do all the work" for 10%, this sort of thing.
Still his response was incredibly over the top. Didn't start off with "I am NOT interested", but instead with screaming. How many calls per month, per week?
Per day?!
Re: Settlement for Australian users impacted by Cambridge Analytica incident
#20Kinda weird. We (Australia) have a new major data breach every month. Seems strange to single out Meta, what about Optus, St Vincent’s, Dymocks, the AFP (!), the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (hardly surpising, with their 1990s website), Pizza Hut, the Royal Women’s Hospital, and about 100 (not hyperbole) others?