Live data from Hacker News

Bluesky is on the verge of overtaking Threads in all the ways that matter

mashable.com

11–20 of 355 posts

Re: Bluesky is on the verge of overtaking Threads in all the ways that matter

#11
Low quality article aside, Threads also had a major spike in usage that quickly dropped off. I could be wrong, but I’m going to guess Bluesky will be the same. They don’t seem to offer anything new/different other than moderation, which I’m not convinced is enough to shift momentum from x to bluesky

Re: Bluesky is on the verge of overtaking Threads in all the ways that matter

#12

How is Threads? I keep getting ads to push me to join it on Instagram, but whatever they recommend me via those ads is usually vapid Linkedin-type drivel. And I can’t see it on phone without the app.

I open it up once in a while but it mainly seems to be ranked by predicted CTR/engagement. For example, out of the first 20 posts in my feed I got a ton of travel/finance guru garbage and multiple posts with some variant of “Do not buy a Tesla, plenty of better EV choices.” And random memes stolen from other sites.

Tons of posts trying to get me to click on them to read more.

None of the accounts in my feed are ones I follow. It’s basically algorithmically driven slop.

Re: Bluesky is on the verge of overtaking Threads in all the ways that matter

#13

Low quality article aside, Threads also had a major spike in usage that quickly dropped off. I could be wrong, but I’m going to guess Bluesky will be the same. They don’t seem to offer anything new/different other than moderation, which I’m not convinced is enough to shift momentum from x to bluesky

There is more momentum against Musk now than when threads launched. Not sure it is enough to overcome the network effect - but there is a lot of illwill towards his projects.

I can see how something like SpaceX is overall a net good, but I don't see that upside for X.

Re: Bluesky is on the verge of overtaking Threads in all the ways that matter

#14

Low quality article aside, Threads also had a major spike in usage that quickly dropped off. I could be wrong, but I’m going to guess Bluesky will be the same. They don’t seem to offer anything new/different other than moderation, which I’m not convinced is enough to shift momentum from x to bluesky

I’m going to guess you don’t use the service much… You’d likely have a very different opinion otherwise

Re: Bluesky is on the verge of overtaking Threads in all the ways that matter

#15

Low quality article aside, Threads also had a major spike in usage that quickly dropped off. I could be wrong, but I’m going to guess Bluesky will be the same. They don’t seem to offer anything new/different other than moderation, which I’m not convinced is enough to shift momentum from x to bluesky

It would be the worst thing for Bluesky if the eternal September came over from Twitter. I think that population is too passive to make the move and will put up with any level of advertising etc.

Re: Bluesky is on the verge of overtaking Threads in all the ways that matter

#16

Is it all the ways that matter? The author mentions one way, DAU. Sure, that is important but I can think of other things that matter. The number of “creator” accounts matters just as much as the number of lurkers. From my experience Bluesky is way better and has respect for the user’s choice front and center. Lists of users to follow is a first-class citizen feature. Their algorithm is a chronological feed, not boos…

> Their algorithm is a chronological feed

Why does a chronological feed get considered and algo? Do we consider SQL queries with WHERE and ORDER BY clauses an algo now?

Re: Bluesky is on the verge of overtaking Threads in all the ways that matter

#17

> Meta-owned Threads started November with 5 times the daily app users of Bluesky. That number is now down to just 1.5. Is this because Threads is fading into obscurity and has fewer daily app users than their peak, and Bluesky has a bit more than they had before in November? Today are either within an order of magnitude of X?

Blusky started at 0. Threads started with existing meta users. That seems like a big difference to me.

Re: Bluesky is on the verge of overtaking Threads in all the ways that matter

#19

Low quality article aside, Threads also had a major spike in usage that quickly dropped off. I could be wrong, but I’m going to guess Bluesky will be the same. They don’t seem to offer anything new/different other than moderation, which I’m not convinced is enough to shift momentum from x to bluesky

As someone (who likes to think) is pretty unbiased politically, I can say I’ll go wherever the people I’m interested post. I have been somewhat surprised that pretty non political accounts have moved to Bluesky which I have interpreted as both political and motivated by the loads of political bs that are posted on x that normal people simply get tired of. I think Bluesky will gain more traction than threads but will end up being a more successful mastodon. A place where people with massive followings who simply don’t like x will post and there will be two competing apps.

Re: Bluesky is on the verge of overtaking Threads in all the ways that matter

#20

Low quality article aside, Threads also had a major spike in usage that quickly dropped off. I could be wrong, but I’m going to guess Bluesky will be the same. They don’t seem to offer anything new/different other than moderation, which I’m not convinced is enough to shift momentum from x to bluesky

For social media, moderation makes the product
Post reply on HN