Bluesky is on the verge of overtaking Threads in all the ways that matter
11–20 of 355 posts
Re: Bluesky is on the verge of overtaking Threads in all the ways that matter
#12How is Threads? I keep getting ads to push me to join it on Instagram, but whatever they recommend me via those ads is usually vapid Linkedin-type drivel. And I can’t see it on phone without the app.
Tons of posts trying to get me to click on them to read more.
None of the accounts in my feed are ones I follow. It’s basically algorithmically driven slop.
Re: Bluesky is on the verge of overtaking Threads in all the ways that matter
#13Low quality article aside, Threads also had a major spike in usage that quickly dropped off. I could be wrong, but I’m going to guess Bluesky will be the same. They don’t seem to offer anything new/different other than moderation, which I’m not convinced is enough to shift momentum from x to bluesky
I can see how something like SpaceX is overall a net good, but I don't see that upside for X.
Re: Bluesky is on the verge of overtaking Threads in all the ways that matter
#14Low quality article aside, Threads also had a major spike in usage that quickly dropped off. I could be wrong, but I’m going to guess Bluesky will be the same. They don’t seem to offer anything new/different other than moderation, which I’m not convinced is enough to shift momentum from x to bluesky
Re: Bluesky is on the verge of overtaking Threads in all the ways that matter
#15Low quality article aside, Threads also had a major spike in usage that quickly dropped off. I could be wrong, but I’m going to guess Bluesky will be the same. They don’t seem to offer anything new/different other than moderation, which I’m not convinced is enough to shift momentum from x to bluesky
Re: Bluesky is on the verge of overtaking Threads in all the ways that matter
#16Is it all the ways that matter? The author mentions one way, DAU. Sure, that is important but I can think of other things that matter. The number of “creator” accounts matters just as much as the number of lurkers. From my experience Bluesky is way better and has respect for the user’s choice front and center. Lists of users to follow is a first-class citizen feature. Their algorithm is a chronological feed, not boos…
Why does a chronological feed get considered and algo? Do we consider SQL queries with WHERE and ORDER BY clauses an algo now?
Re: Bluesky is on the verge of overtaking Threads in all the ways that matter
#17> Meta-owned Threads started November with 5 times the daily app users of Bluesky. That number is now down to just 1.5. Is this because Threads is fading into obscurity and has fewer daily app users than their peak, and Bluesky has a bit more than they had before in November? Today are either within an order of magnitude of X?
Re: Bluesky is on the verge of overtaking Threads in all the ways that matter
#18> overtaking Threads So the lowest bar possibly imaginable?
Re: Bluesky is on the verge of overtaking Threads in all the ways that matter
#19Low quality article aside, Threads also had a major spike in usage that quickly dropped off. I could be wrong, but I’m going to guess Bluesky will be the same. They don’t seem to offer anything new/different other than moderation, which I’m not convinced is enough to shift momentum from x to bluesky
Re: Bluesky is on the verge of overtaking Threads in all the ways that matter
#20Low quality article aside, Threads also had a major spike in usage that quickly dropped off. I could be wrong, but I’m going to guess Bluesky will be the same. They don’t seem to offer anything new/different other than moderation, which I’m not convinced is enough to shift momentum from x to bluesky