Investing in GitHub
11–17 of 17 posts
Re: Investing in GitHub
#12"Why? Because we want to be better." This is the least transparent reasoning I've seen in a long time.
Re: Investing in GitHub
#13I.e. second leg of the current trend, when successful SaaS companies will offer products, which can be install on-premises.
In case of github it's Github for Your Firewall.
Re: Investing in GitHub
#14Between parse, trigger.io, trello, and github, it seems there's more shovel-selling going on than actual gold-digging.
Re: Investing in GitHub
#15"Why? Because we want to be better." This is the least transparent reasoning I've seen in a long time.
Re: Investing in GitHub
#16The following isn't meant to harm or critizise anyone, but isn't such kind of outside investment more about changing your now worthy company stack against some more handy dollar notes? If a company just needs cash for profitable ideas they could get a loan, right? So if that's the case why would people say differently in their blog? Well, anyway I'm happy that Github is doing fine.
They must have plans to venture out into unproven territory that includes risk to their core business that would make a bank balk at approving the loan.
Re: Investing in GitHub
#17A16Z betting on Enterprise-tization of SaaS. I.e. second leg of the current trend, when successful SaaS companies will offer products, which can be install on-premises. In case of github it's Github for Your Firewall.