NASA: Space flight is still something we don’t fully understand, we’re finding things that we don’t expect sometimes. This was one of those times, and we’re still piecing things together on this and so to maintain medical privacy and to let our processes go forward in an orderly manner, this is all we’re going to say about that event at this time Gizmodo: fuck their privacy!!
It's likely they will publish their findings once they figure it out. Probably after a considerable time passes to help obfuscate the individuals involved.
NASA remains silent on why crew went to hospital after dragon splashdown
11–20 of 166 posts
Re: NASA remains silent on why crew went to hospital after dragon splashdown
#12edit to add: These spacecraft all use very toxic fuels, and this one has had issues with fuel leaks before [0]. I'm not sure how or if those could affect the crew. Maybe if there was contamination on an exterior surface, they could have been exposed on landing? IIRC it is or used to be standard procedure to take air samples before opening crewed spacecraft, for this reason.
edited again to add: I found it! It Apollo-Soyuz in 1975—the entire Apollo crew were poisoned by fuel when they opened the spacecraft, and were hospitalized with chemical pneumonitis [1,2].
[0] https://arstechnica.com/science/2022/06/nasa-delays-cargo-dr... ("NASA and SpaceX stand down on Dragon launch to study hydrazine issue")
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo–Soyuz#Re-entry_and_afte...
[2] https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19770023791 ("The Apollo-Soyuz Test Project: Medical report")
- (wiki) "The only serious problem was during reentry and splashdown of the Apollo craft, during which the crew were accidentally exposed to toxic monomethylhydrazine and nitrogen tetroxide fumes, caused by unignited reaction control system (RCS) hypergolic propellants venting from the spacecraft and reentering a cabin air intake. The RCS was inadvertently left on during descent, and the toxic fumes were sucked into the spacecraft as it drew in outside air. Brand briefly lost consciousness, while Stafford retrieved emergency oxygen masks, put one on Brand, and gave one to Slayton. The three astronauts were hospitalized for two weeks in Honolulu, Hawaii.[22] Brand took responsibility for the mishap; because of high noise levels in the cabin during reentry, he believed he was unable to hear Stafford call off one item of the reentry checklist, the closure of two switches which would have automatically shut off the RCS and begun drogue parachute deployment. These procedures were manually performed later than usual, allowing the ingestion of the propellant fumes through the ventilation system.[23]"
Re: NASA remains silent on why crew went to hospital after dragon splashdown
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's likely they will publish their findings once they figure it out. Probably after a considerable time passes to help obfuscate the individuals involved.
Obfuscation isn't really possible. The identities of the crew are very public, and they all got hospitalized, so there isn't even room for guessing games about which one.
Re: NASA remains silent on why crew went to hospital after dragon splashdown
#14Re: NASA remains silent on why crew went to hospital after dragon splashdown
#15Could it be an initially-unnoticed chemical leak in the Crew Dragon? That could explain how it hospitalized four astronauts at once, and also why they're uncharacteristically afraid of media coverage. They were evasive in a similar way when Starliner was first having issues—they're scared of the politics, or of the lawyers. edit to add: These spacecraft all use very toxic fuels, and this one has had issues with fuel…
Re: NASA remains silent on why crew went to hospital after dragon splashdown
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's likely they will publish their findings once they figure it out. Probably after a considerable time passes to help obfuscate the individuals involved.
Obfuscation isn't really possible. The identities of the crew are very public, and they all got hospitalized, so there isn't even room for guessing games about which one.
Re: NASA remains silent on why crew went to hospital after dragon splashdown
#17https://blogs.nasa.gov/commercialcrew/2024/10/25/nasa-provid...
The next day NASA announced "The crew member is in good health and will resume normal post-flight reconditioning with other crew members."
https://blogs.nasa.gov/spacestation/2024/10/26/nasas-spacex-...
Re: NASA remains silent on why crew went to hospital after dragon splashdown
#18Could it be an initially-unnoticed chemical leak in the Crew Dragon? That could explain how it hospitalized four astronauts at once, and also why they're uncharacteristically afraid of media coverage. They were evasive in a similar way when Starliner was first having issues—they're scared of the politics, or of the lawyers. edit to add: These spacecraft all use very toxic fuels, and this one has had issues with fuel…
[dead]
Re: NASA remains silent on why crew went to hospital after dragon splashdown
#19Just a wild guess without anything backing it up and to get the guessing party started... something like decompression sickness? edit: love the answers, but would rather party.
Re: NASA remains silent on why crew went to hospital after dragon splashdown
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
[dead]
They’re still figuring out what happened. When they know, we’ll know. NASA does not have authority to unilaterally release medical information of its astronauts, so there’s nothing to say until the problem is identified.
Just to clarify—and I'm not denying her right to choose to do that—the person quoted in the article as citing "medical privacy" is one of the astronauts who was hospitalized.