Isn’t using big models like gpt-4o going to slow down the autocomplete?
GitHub cuts AI deals with Google, Anthropic
11–20 of 742 posts
Re: GitHub cuts AI deals with Google, Anthropic
#12I wonder if this is an example of the freedom of being an arms length subsidiary or foreshadowing to a broader strategy shift within Microsoft.
Re: GitHub cuts AI deals with Google, Anthropic
#13[deleted]
Re: GitHub cuts AI deals with Google, Anthropic
#14Wake me up when they support self hosted llama or openwebui. Wonder if we'll ever see a standard LLM API.
> Wonder if we'll ever see a standard LLM API.
At this point its just the OpenAI API
Re: GitHub cuts AI deals with Google, Anthropic
#15Actually excited 2M context window will be useful in this case
Re: GitHub cuts AI deals with Google, Anthropic
#16Wake me up when they support self hosted llama or openwebui. Wonder if we'll ever see a standard LLM API.
Isn there no open source alternative? Like a plugin or something.
Re: GitHub cuts AI deals with Google, Anthropic
#17I wonder what the rationale for this was internally. More OpenAI issues? competitiveness with Cursor? It seems good for the user to increase competition across LLM providers. Also ambiguous title. I thought GitHub canceled deals they had in the work. The article is clearly about making a deal, but it's unclear from the article's title.
[deleted]
Re: GitHub cuts AI deals with Google, Anthropic
#18I wonder how this will affect latency,
Re: GitHub cuts AI deals with Google, Anthropic
#19"cuts" has to be the worse word choice in this context, it sounds like they're terminating deals rather than creating them.
"inks"
Re: GitHub cuts AI deals with Google, Anthropic
#20Isn’t using big models like gpt-4o going to slow down the autocomplete?
I think they mean for the chat and code editing features.