Love the concept - though in the versions where Trump loses, you should probably say 'Trump says system is rigged, or election stolen, etc.' -- we all know he'll never concede when he loses.
Show HN: The Probability Times
11–20 of 21 posts
Re: Show HN: The Probability Times
#12Interesting concept, but some of the pictures are a bit weird. There’s one with Biden and Harris in a practically romantic embrace.
I my blogpost, I have a few examples of the discarded ones, including one of Harris and Obama in a similar romantic vibe: https://nerology.substack.com/p/how-i-made-the-probability-t...
I think at some point in the prompt I literally said that they were not romantically involved.
Re: Show HN: The Probability Times
#13> Donald Trump Concedes... Hm, maybe the prompt is too tightly constrained. There is historical precedent for Donald Trump refusing to concede a presidential race, as seen in the 2020 election when he did not formally concede to Joe Biden and instead launched numerous legal challenges, citing unsubstantiated claims of election fraud. But I concede that no such outcome is represented in the FiveThirtyEight dataset.
Re: Show HN: The Probability Times
#14Love the concept - though in the versions where Trump loses, you should probably say 'Trump says system is rigged, or election stolen, etc.' -- we all know he'll never concede when he loses.
I deliberately tried to keep the content neutral. The goal of the website is translating statistics to something tangible - not adding an extra sauce of assumptions to it!
Re: Show HN: The Probability Times
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
I deliberately tried to keep the content neutral. The goal of the website is translating statistics to something tangible - not adding an extra sauce of assumptions to it!
You can be politically neutral or factually neutral - not both. Seems like you chose the former.
Re: Show HN: The Probability Times
#16Re: Show HN: The Probability Times
#17Re: Show HN: The Probability Times
#18Jokes aside, I feel like this is how journalist work. They need to have news ready for both outcomes
Re: Show HN: The Probability Times
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
I deliberately tried to keep the content neutral. The goal of the website is translating statistics to something tangible - not adding an extra sauce of assumptions to it!
You can be politically neutral or factually neutral - not both. Seems like you chose the former.