Live data from Hacker News

Their Uber Driver Crashed. A Pizza Order Unraveled Their Injury Lawsuit

nytimes.com

11–14 of 14 posts

Re: Their Uber Driver Crashed. A Pizza Order Unraveled Their Injury Lawsuit

#11

So, by using the app, I'm not covered? Then if I'm not covered by any insurance from Uber, what does cover me as a user. Is it just my personal health insurance? Asking for real. What is the way accidents are resolved? I'm suddenly a little hesitant to use Uber, because it is too risky.

I suspect they wanted to sue for a large payout, much more than covering health care costs. Notice their attorney refused to discuss the proposed amount. They figured a jury would give them more than an arbitrator paid by Uber.

This is pure speculation and unhelpful to the discussion. This sets a bad precedent for the reach of admissibility of T&C agreements, regardless of amount.

Re: Their Uber Driver Crashed. A Pizza Order Unraveled Their Injury Lawsuit

#13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I guess it makes a better headline? No. It is about the pizza order in the same way that Disney tried to get out of a wrongful death suit using terms in the Disney+ app account signup. No one ordering food or using a TV app knows about arbitration clauses which are so broad that they should be illegal.

But the pizza order was only one instance of several times the parents would have had to agree to arbitration. Even if the pizza has never happened, they would still have been stuck in arbitration.

The pizza order alone though was both necessary and sufficient for the company to claim that they were bound to arbitration for a car crash. That clauses such as that are legal alone is ridiculous to the concept of justice on its face.
Post reply on HN