Live data from Hacker News

Judge blocks California's new AI law in case over Kamala Harris deepfake

techcrunch.com

11–12 of 12 posts

Re: Judge blocks California's new AI law in case over Kamala Harris deepfake

#11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

in the 2000s, we would've said the same thing about the ease of use and scale of photoshop for image doctoring too

the scale and pervasiveness in which these things can spread now is many orders of magnitude more now. It isn’t an accurate comparison. also, I was there in the 2000’s, there wasn’t remotely the same amount of concern then, because these things are not the same

After each technological leap, it was an order of magnitude each time, and still the world hasn’t ended yet despite the handwringers at every stage of technological development

Re: Judge blocks California's new AI law in case over Kamala Harris deepfake

#12

I think we're going to find out some uncomfortable lessons about our current interpretation of free speech being incompatible with the current generative AI technology. Strictly, I think the judge's ruling is correct - this is definitely a constitutional issue of free speech. However, one mistake people make frequently in these debates is that not all forms of speech are necessarily protected by law - for instance, y…

I don't think there is anything fundamentally different. The only argument is scale and ease of use, but you could apply that to hiring poorly paid artists in a third world country somewhere like existing troll armies. A better question is would creating a law actually stop this? There's tons of ad fraud and misinformation already and my impression is the war is already lost. Most large platforms didn't have the kind of moderation to keep control of this kind of thing before. Small communities often do but they aren't usually the target and have less effect.
Post reply on HN