Live data from Hacker News

Gorhill pulls uBlock Origin Lite from Firefox store

neowin.net

11–20 of 442 posts

Re: Gorhill pulls uBlock Origin Lite from Firefox store

#11
post #2

Apparently, as the article says, the lite version is the recommended one by the author to be used

The article is misleading. The lite version is recommended on chrome because very soon the non lite version will stop working.

It doesn't apply to firefox.

Re: Gorhill pulls uBlock Origin Lite from Firefox store

#13

>The last message from the developer in a now-closed GitHub issue shows an email from Mozilla admitting its fault and apologizing for the mistake. However, Raymond still pulled the extension from the Mozilla Add-ons Store, which means you can no longer find it on addons.mozilla.org. This seems pretty harsh. Mozilla made a mistake, Mozilla apologized, Mozilla fixed the mistake (maybe even improved their processes), an…

Feels like they were just waiting for a reason to pull out – likely feels its a hassle to upload and have it review and just want everyone to trust them and keep it simple

And I guess some people would claim that since its an open source addon no one can feel entitled to anything else

Re: Gorhill pulls uBlock Origin Lite from Firefox store

#14

>The last message from the developer in a now-closed GitHub issue shows an email from Mozilla admitting its fault and apologizing for the mistake. However, Raymond still pulled the extension from the Mozilla Add-ons Store, which means you can no longer find it on addons.mozilla.org. This seems pretty harsh. Mozilla made a mistake, Mozilla apologized, Mozilla fixed the mistake (maybe even improved their processes), an…

[flagged]

Re: Gorhill pulls uBlock Origin Lite from Firefox store

#15
Mozilla decided at some point to kill extensions - whether following Google Chrome or of its own volition. It took an axe to its ecosystem by disablign the loading of anything external other than WebExtensions - and note that it's just an artificial disabling, as internally, Firefox is still basically some bundled "extensions" over a C++ core.

And now there's the "manifest v3" change, and making people jump through hoops to be on AMO.

This is very sad, almost as much as the internal governance over there.

Re: Gorhill pulls uBlock Origin Lite from Firefox store

#16
post #7

Because no one ever have taken over and compromised high profile extensions? Chrome battles with it a lot, see eg. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36146278 I find Mozilla's process to be quite reassuring, but would be good to have alternative "addon stores" that also have a review process

Mozilla is definitely doing the right thing by reviewing the extensions, but the issue here is that were wrong, they found issues that didn't exist (such as claiming it contained obfuscated code and collected private data).

It appears the issues were found using simple heuristics (e.g they detected string pagead2.googlesyndication.com in a comment) and these detections weren't then manually reviewed as claimed, which is wasting everybody's time.

Re: Gorhill pulls uBlock Origin Lite from Firefox store

#17

But... ublock is like the main reason I use FF

You can continue to use Ublock Origin, which uses the v2 manifest.

The delisted extension, Ublock Origin lite, is a v3 manifest plugin. Apparently it was created to address chrome blocking the v2 extension, but you can continue to use the v2 extension on Firefox

Re: Gorhill pulls uBlock Origin Lite from Firefox store

#19

But... ublock is like the main reason I use FF

ublock origin is still available in the Firefox add-on store.

The developer has pulled the 'lite' version, which is developed mainly for Chrome because Google killed some APIs the full version was using.

Re: Gorhill pulls uBlock Origin Lite from Firefox store

#20
post #5

I really hope Raymond Hill won't do the same for uBlock Origin (the manifest v2 version). I'm not too comfortable recommending others to install a self-hosted extension. It's a shame Mozilla and Raymond Hill can't/won't solve this together. I get that the review he got simply should not have happened for an extension like this (see the Github thread¹) and that he is simply done with bothering, but I worry about how t…

Latest update from the link you provided: The Mozilla review team acknowledged their error and rectified it. Hopefully that allows it to continue existing.
Post reply on HN