> We highly recommend using Chrome! Er... what does this mean? Firefox is not supported? If so, the author should just say that.
Ah, yes, the web: Infinitely cross platform and portable, except "this website will only work if you run the js with this specific js interpreter, and also we dont know how to do css so we used very platform specific css, and also our html is not complaint but Chrome doesn't care, and also... but its cross platform. Its the web, it runs anywhere!"
There Is No Website
11–20 of 92 posts
Re: There Is No Website
#12Earlier quoted context omitted.
But who is to blame? I, the one who has amount x of time and wants to reach the maximum amount of people? Or the browser vendors for just doing the bare minimum to be compatible with each other but nothing more. The browser vendors do have a lot more manpower (and money) than me…
Firefox is the libre alternative struggling to compete with the Google behemoth which adds things to its browser even faster than they appear in the standard. Safari is the underfunded child of a corporation as wealthy as Google. It is mainly the first that motivates web developer solidarity.
Re: There Is No Website
#13[1] https://mrdoob.com/projects/chromeexperiments/google-gravity...
Re: There Is No Website
#14> We highly recommend using Chrome! Er... what does this mean? Firefox is not supported? If so, the author should just say that.
Re: There Is No Website
#15Re: There Is No Website
#16Re: There Is No Website
#17> We highly recommend using Chrome! Er... what does this mean? Firefox is not supported? If so, the author should just say that.
the author did say that, just in different wording
chrome and firefox are not the only browsers
Re: There Is No Website
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ah, yes, the web: Infinitely cross platform and portable, except "this website will only work if you run the js with this specific js interpreter, and also we dont know how to do css so we used very platform specific css, and also our html is not complaint but Chrome doesn't care, and also... but its cross platform. Its the web, it runs anywhere!"
But who is to blame? I, the one who has amount x of time and wants to reach the maximum amount of people? Or the browser vendors for just doing the bare minimum to be compatible with each other but nothing more. The browser vendors do have a lot more manpower (and money) than me…
Re: There Is No Website
#19Note for Firefox users, the "cat video" section is not working, and you will not be able to experience the rest of the app. You are supposed to break the player in a Google Gravity[1] like fashion, but it's broken. They should not "highly" recommend using chrome, but just say it does not work on other browsers. [1] https://mrdoob.com/projects/chromeexperiments/google-gravity...
I argue that specifying where it doesn't work is pretty stupid. Just specify what you tested it on. It works on those and may or may not work on others. If you'd like it to work on other browsers you can see if you can contact the author to help them with financial support to get the other ones working.
Re: There Is No Website
#20> We highly recommend using Chrome! Er... what does this mean? Firefox is not supported? If so, the author should just say that.
Ah, yes, the web: Infinitely cross platform and portable, except "this website will only work if you run the js with this specific js interpreter, and also we dont know how to do css so we used very platform specific css, and also our html is not complaint but Chrome doesn't care, and also... but its cross platform. Its the web, it runs anywhere!"