> Football (206 posts)
Either hacker news really likes the national forensic league, or these LLM-categories are a bit dubious.
Also hmmm:
> American football (7 posts)
> American_football (6 posts)
11–20 of 79 posts
> Football (206 posts)
Either hacker news really likes the national forensic league, or these LLM-categories are a bit dubious.
Also hmmm:
> American football (7 posts)
> American_football (6 posts)
[flagged]
I was horrified when I read international students as one of top on the hate list. Although I saw a couple of comments attributed their cities housing crises on international students and thought that this sentiment is wide supported.
>> Use the tool below to explore various topics and the sentiments they evoke. This is a cool phrase. It is personally important as when I was asked in a panel interview @ -- They asked "what do you think Twitter is? My response was "You're a global sentiment engine"" (There are a lot of conversations I'd love to have with the HN community with respect to our shared experiences, and weird history flipped-bits that ex…
You could watch Twitter go from being a niche little new thing to popular to "twitter is trash" too popular to increasingly divisive to the purchase and rename to X to today.
Great work folks, glad we can all agree on that one.
Interesting that they used an LLM for this. I mean it makes sense and the data seems to pass the pub test but I, in my ignorance, would not have assumed that a language model would be well suited for number crunching.
Is this just using LLM to be cool? How does pure LLM with basic "In the scale between 0-10 ..." prompt stack up against traditional, battle-tested sentiment analysis tools? Gemini suggests NLTK and spaCy https://www.nltk.org/ https://spacy.io/
Also, many exisiting sentiment analysis tools have a lot of research behind them that can be referenced when interpreting the results (known confounds etc). I don't think there is yet an equivalent for the LLM approach
> Hate : Torture Great work folks, glad we can all agree on that one. Interesting that they used an LLM for this. I mean it makes sense and the data seems to pass the pub test but I, in my ignorance, would not have assumed that a language model would be well suited for number crunching.