The CPP repudiated Old China back in the day. Now they want to embrace Old China because it gives the CPP legitimacy. So the world turns.
Chinese archaeologists are striking out along the Silk Road
11–20 of 113 posts
Re: Chinese archaeologists are striking out along the Silk Road
#12The CPP repudiated Old China back in the day. Now they want to embrace Old China because it gives the CPP legitimacy. So the world turns.
Re: Chinese archaeologists are striking out along the Silk Road
#13If your goal in research is to p-hack your way to a conclusion, you will always succeed.
P-hack?
Re: Chinese archaeologists are striking out along the Silk Road
#14It’s unlikely that this is really going to move the needle as far as rivalry between China and other countries goes; it’s more of a side effect of that rivalry, like national museums, the Olympics, and moon landings.
Re: Chinese archaeologists are striking out along the Silk Road
#15Re: Chinese archaeologists are striking out along the Silk Road
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
P-hack?
In statistics, the p-value is shorthand for “how unlikely was this result.” Smaller p-values indicate less likely results, which in turn creates evidence of a relationship between variables. Many naive approaches to statically analysis place an almost magical value on the 5% threshold, but that’s not actually a rare event if you run dozens of tests. P-hacking generally refers to running tests and discarding the value…
Re: Chinese archaeologists are striking out along the Silk Road
#17The myth of China being China for millenia is such a propagandist rewrite of history in that region; I hate to see NYT headlines fall for it.
Re: Chinese archaeologists are striking out along the Silk Road
#18If your goal in research is to p-hack your way to a conclusion, you will always succeed.
Re: Chinese archaeologists are striking out along the Silk Road
#19Re: Chinese archaeologists are striking out along the Silk Road
#20[deleted]