Ray user here, what language actors are they using? Ray support Python Java and cpp actors…
Amazon's exabyte-scale migration from Apache Spark to Ray on EC2
11–20 of 95 posts
Re: Amazon's exabyte-scale migration from Apache Spark to Ray on EC2
#12Re: Amazon's exabyte-scale migration from Apache Spark to Ray on EC2
#13Are we talking about big data ETL here? I did not know Ray was suited for it.
Re: Amazon's exabyte-scale migration from Apache Spark to Ray on EC2
#14Crazy that the project took almost 4 years end-to-end, and it's still ongoing. I had no idea anything at AWS had that long of an attention span. It's funny and telling that in the end, it's all backed by CSVs in s3. Long live CSV!
Re: Amazon's exabyte-scale migration from Apache Spark to Ray on EC2
#15Crazy that the project took almost 4 years end-to-end, and it's still ongoing. I had no idea anything at AWS had that long of an attention span. It's funny and telling that in the end, it's all backed by CSVs in s3. Long live CSV!
Re: Amazon's exabyte-scale migration from Apache Spark to Ray on EC2
#16Does the sales team know about this? /jk
Re: Amazon's exabyte-scale migration from Apache Spark to Ray on EC2
#17> From the typical Amazon EC2 customer’s perspective, this translates to saving over $120MM/year on Amazon EC2 on-demand R5 instance charges. Does the sales team know about this? /jk
Re: Amazon's exabyte-scale migration from Apache Spark to Ray on EC2
#18> From the typical Amazon EC2 customer’s perspective, this translates to saving over $120MM/year on Amazon EC2 on-demand R5 instance charges. Does the sales team know about this? /jk
Re: Amazon's exabyte-scale migration from Apache Spark to Ray on EC2
#19Crazy that the project took almost 4 years end-to-end, and it's still ongoing. I had no idea anything at AWS had that long of an attention span. It's funny and telling that in the end, it's all backed by CSVs in s3. Long live CSV!
Most people are moving away from CSV for big datasets, except in exceptional cases involving linear reads (append only ETL). CSV has one big upside which is human readability. But so many downsides: poor random access, no typing, no compression, complex parser needing to handle exceptions.