CalcGPT
11–20 of 54 posts
Re: CalcGPT
#12I'm surprised babbage is still available via APIs - https://platform.openai.com/docs/models/gpt-base
Anyone else using this?
Re: CalcGPT
#13this is just using a shitty model: calcgpt: input: 88×66 output: 5184 chatgpt: input: 88×66 output: 88 × 66 equals 5808.
Re: CalcGPT
#14Cue the comments about criticism of this calculator being unfair as thinking, for example, that 88*10 = 888 is a ‘very human’ mistake to make.
(10a+b)(10c+d) = 100ac+10(ad+bc)+bd
Re: CalcGPT
#15Re: CalcGPT
#16Supposedly 0/0 is zero. Good to know from now on.
Re: CalcGPT
#17this is just using a shitty model: calcgpt: input: 88×66 output: 5184 chatgpt: input: 88×66 output: 88 × 66 equals 5808.
Wolfram Alpha:
Q: (706458021-342622146)*988457934
A: 359,636,457,317,582,250
ChatGPT:
Q: What is the solution to (706458021-342622146)*988457934
A: The solution to (706458021 - 342622146) x 988457934 is 359,636,457,317,582,250 [Python button]
ChatGPT:
Q: Write a press release announcing a momentous scientific discovery: the solution to (706458021-342622146)*988457934
A: [...] The equation, which involves the subtraction of two large integers followed by multiplication with another large integer, has been resolved to yield a precise result of 359,462,296,091,341,640. The computation was executed with utmost precision, demonstrating the profound capabilities of modern mathematical techniques and computational power. [...] [no Python button]
Re: CalcGPT
#18Cue the comments about criticism of this calculator being unfair as thinking, for example, that 88*10 = 888 is a ‘very human’ mistake to make.
You can only get an 8 in the rightmost digit of the result by multiples of the rightmost digits, but 0 8 obviously gets you a 0, so fairly easy to see this is wrong. (10a+b) (10c+d) = 100ac+10(ad+bc)+bd
Re: CalcGPT
#19Re: CalcGPT
#20This is amazing. An antidote to the mesmerisation.