11–20 of 23 posts
I looked at the samples in your github project. All the samples there have jpegs as pages. Do you have something similar to the demo on the live site (html instead of image files)? Nice work.
Took ages before I figured out how to flip pages O.o
Having to find and move a scrollbar to move the pages was not immediately intuitive.
Took ages before I figured out how to flip pages O.o
Agreed. It looks nice, but it has poor usability. I tried common things like clicking the edge of the page, scrolling on my trackpad, and using keyboard arrows, but none of them worked to scroll it. Having to find and move a scrollbar to move the pages was not immediately intuitive.
Took ages before I figured out how to flip pages O.o
Agreed. It looks nice, but it has poor usability. I tried common things like clicking the edge of the page, scrolling on my trackpad, and using keyboard arrows, but none of them worked to scroll it. Having to find and move a scrollbar to move the pages was not immediately intuitive.
You also don't present any good use cases - why would I want to spend $99 on this? What does it do for me that a plain website cannot?
Consider presenting the benefits of your idea using your idea, like you did with the API docs, to demonstrate a practical use case.
Apart from those things - great idea!
Are you kidding me?
Why on earth are people trying to hang onto the paper style? I get that publishers don't want to rehash all their print media just for digital downloads, but why do we have to shoe-horn that into some crappy, unneccessary page transition process?