> What I want to criticize is that Apple would rather re-add Magsafe than add another USB-C port, making one wonder if they are really clearing out old inventory. This is so minor, but clearly MagSafe isn’t about clearing out old inventory because it’s a different connector than old MagSafe.
Comparing the Framework Laptop with the MacBook Air M2: A Detailed Review
11–20 of 98 posts
Re: Comparing the Framework Laptop with the MacBook Air M2: A Detailed Review
#12The author doesn't care about either the keyboard or the display because external parts are used... Maybe a mini PC is a better option for him?
Re: Comparing the Framework Laptop with the MacBook Air M2: A Detailed Review
#13Just a random thought, it's amazing how competitive a startup can be when compared to a company that has orders of magnitude more R&D funds! Tradtionally, I would think hardware products would have a relatively large moat!
Re: Comparing the Framework Laptop with the MacBook Air M2: A Detailed Review
#14I want framework to succeed because i like the idea of modularity but c'mon, go against a MacBook Pro at least.
Re: Comparing the Framework Laptop with the MacBook Air M2: A Detailed Review
#15Just a random thought, it's amazing how competitive a startup can be when compared to a company that has orders of magnitude more R&D funds! Tradtionally, I would think hardware products would have a relatively large moat!
Re: Comparing the Framework Laptop with the MacBook Air M2: A Detailed Review
#16Just a random thought, it's amazing how competitive a startup can be when compared to a company that has orders of magnitude more R&D funds! Tradtionally, I would think hardware products would have a relatively large moat!
Well the MacBook air is the cut down budget product. The Framework can't compare to the MacBook Pro. The mini led screen, the battery life, the performance, the speakers. I wish it did because I much prefer Linux to MacOS
Re: Comparing the Framework Laptop with the MacBook Air M2: A Detailed Review
#17My first-gen Framework 13 with Ubuntu is usable, but has major issues around power. Battery life is very poor compared to ordinary laptops (I get ~3 hours of web browsing and light coding), and compared to M-series Macbooks (which have extraordinary battery life >8 hours) it is abysmal. Suspend/resume often fails in strange ways, and occasionally even power on is problematic (e.g. battery is full but it won't turn on…
With that said, if a company offered me the choice between a PC or a Mac, I’d pick the Mac every time. It’s different when someone else is paying ;).
Re: Comparing the Framework Laptop with the MacBook Air M2: A Detailed Review
#18Just a random thought, it's amazing how competitive a startup can be when compared to a company that has orders of magnitude more R&D funds! Tradtionally, I would think hardware products would have a relatively large moat!
Well the MacBook air is the cut down budget product. The Framework can't compare to the MacBook Pro. The mini led screen, the battery life, the performance, the speakers. I wish it did because I much prefer Linux to MacOS
Re: Comparing the Framework Laptop with the MacBook Air M2: A Detailed Review
#19The author doesn't care about either the keyboard or the display because external parts are used... Maybe a mini PC is a better option for him?
I'm curious if a $500 mini PC plus a bottomed out mb air would suffice (maybe not! Having all your stuff on your laptop can be useful)
For all that, I haven't considered a Mac mini even though I'm probably an ideal user. It doesn't help that it's on the m2 instead of m3, though. (Or m4, which is in iPads?)
I probably should
Re: Comparing the Framework Laptop with the MacBook Air M2: A Detailed Review
#20I love many things about the Framework laptops, and hope Apple learns from them on those things, but ultimately I'm still on Macs because that spec point is worth so much to me.