Why Does Every AI Cycle Start with Chat?
11–17 of 17 posts
Re: Why Does Every AI Cycle Start with Chat?
#12Chat is perhaps the cheapest implementation you could ever build. It's a linear interaction, easy to test, and arguably the easiest to encode/decode (with a fixed set of inputs too). As an added bonus, it has a familiar, well-understood interface.
Re: Why Does Every AI Cycle Start with Chat?
#13Re: Why Does Every AI Cycle Start with Chat?
#14Re: Why Does Every AI Cycle Start with Chat?
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
A better answer: natural language is the programming language everyone knows.
> A better answer: natural language is the programming language everyone knows. And when you get into frustrating misunderstanding of details you end up using a programming language anyway. Natural languages are to ambiguous to be useful for specific things. We humans can resolve the ambiguities in our minds, or think we do, based on context. I think the anthropomorphization argument hits closer to home. I feel guilt…
Re: Why Does Every AI Cycle Start with Chat?
#16Not an actual pattern AI cycle in 2012 started with alexnet AI cycle in 2019 started with Stable Difffusion
Re: Why Does Every AI Cycle Start with Chat?
#17Not an actual pattern AI cycle in 2012 started with alexnet AI cycle in 2019 started with Stable Difffusion
Depends what you mean by 'cycle', I suppose. The current hype-cycle _really_ started with ChatGPT; that was the point where people started getting super-excited and declaring that it would replace all human work by next Thursday.
Yeah, sure a bunch of clowns are talking about how ChatGPT is gonna take over the world meanwhile diffusion is actually making impacts on artists
Again, ChatGPT did not start the hype cycle this time it landed fat in the middle of the GenAI cycle and accelerated it