Let me be the one to ask the obvious question, where did the Flamingo's head go?
Photographer Disqualified from AI Image Contest After Winning with Real Photo
11–20 of 33 posts
Re: Photographer Disqualified from AI Image Contest After Winning with Real Photo
#12Feels like humans cheering for Kasparov when he beat Deep Blue. That fleeting moment in time, a crest of a wave, before the change of times.
Re: Photographer Disqualified from AI Image Contest After Winning with Real Photo
#13Let me be the one to ask the obvious question, where did the Flamingo's head go?
Re: Photographer Disqualified from AI Image Contest After Winning with Real Photo
#14> “I wanted to show that nature can still beat the machine and that there is still merit in real work from real creatives,” Astray tells PetaPixel over email. Sometimes I don't really "get" the art, but everything about this is [chef's kiss].
I say this in slight jest as someone who does amateur / semi-pro photography. Yes, the barrier to entry to generative AI is lower than the barrier to entry for photography. Just like the barrier to entry for photography is (skill wise) lower than the barrier to entry for painting. That is completely unrelated to the high end / skill ceiling. You can use generative AI in creative ways. Just like you can use a box that instantly captures a scene with the press of a button in creative ways.
Re: Photographer Disqualified from AI Image Contest After Winning with Real Photo
#15Feels like humans cheering for Kasparov when he beat Deep Blue. That fleeting moment in time, a crest of a wave, before the change of times.
Can AI come up with new novel things? A nature photographer could , through luck and hard work, photograph a new species of animal while traveling through an unexplored area. Could AI do that?
... yes? Have you actually played around with photo generation tools? You can absolutely generate novel images.
Re: Photographer Disqualified from AI Image Contest After Winning with Real Photo
#16I don't want to see art from someone who has spent a hundred thousand hours looking at the real world.
I want to see art from someone who has spent a hundred thousand hours looking at AI medium output
For you see, the second artist will be quite mad. The first artist is just a pretentious fake who has not destroyed their own mind.
Re: Photographer Disqualified from AI Image Contest After Winning with Real Photo
#17Feels like humans cheering for Kasparov when he beat Deep Blue. That fleeting moment in time, a crest of a wave, before the change of times.
Generative AI may replace the pictures that hang on the walls of hotel rooms, but I don't see it coming for the photographs in peoples homes, or even art galleries. At least, not at any real scale.
Re: Photographer Disqualified from AI Image Contest After Winning with Real Photo
#18> “I wanted to show that nature can still beat the machine and that there is still merit in real work from real creatives,” Astray tells PetaPixel over email. Sometimes I don't really "get" the art, but everything about this is [chef's kiss].
Seems more like a professional basketball player dunking on a jr high after school leave to me.
Re: Photographer Disqualified from AI Image Contest After Winning with Real Photo
#19Feels like humans cheering for Kasparov when he beat Deep Blue. That fleeting moment in time, a crest of a wave, before the change of times.
Can AI come up with new novel things? A nature photographer could , through luck and hard work, photograph a new species of animal while traveling through an unexplored area. Could AI do that?
Re: Photographer Disqualified from AI Image Contest After Winning with Real Photo
#20Feels like humans cheering for Kasparov when he beat Deep Blue. That fleeting moment in time, a crest of a wave, before the change of times.
Can AI come up with new novel things? A nature photographer could , through luck and hard work, photograph a new species of animal while traveling through an unexplored area. Could AI do that?