AI products like ChatGPT much hyped but not much used, study says
11–20 of 40 posts
Re: AI products like ChatGPT much hyped but not much used, study says
#12Re: AI products like ChatGPT much hyped but not much used, study says
#13Re: AI products like ChatGPT much hyped but not much used, study says
#14No shit Sherlock. Until the end of the year we'll see both NVidia and the hyperscalers that rent their h100s see their revenues already shrinking, there's no way we can have that many companies doing LLMs and being useful.
Re: AI products like ChatGPT much hyped but not much used, study says
#15In the early days of the World Wide Web many people saw no need for a website, it’s still very early.
Re: AI products like ChatGPT much hyped but not much used, study says
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
But then this is just parroting, using statistical inferencing, what they "might" have said in their publications (and paraphrasing by countless academic papers, or even worse - since this is probably more likely - random qualified-or-not discourses and ramblings in internet forums), versus any sort of logical thinking, isn't it?
I doubt there are many acedemic articles or even internet forums comparing and contrasting the thinking of Robert Hughes and Carl Jung. A Google search of "Robert Hughes" "Carl Jung" turns up nothing except "Edward Robert Hughes" the painter. This ability of Opus to take a stab at it is what I find so fascinating. I agree, it's not a thinking reasoning being, but it's a pretty good mimic of one, which makes it more t…
Re: AI products like ChatGPT much hyped but not much used, study says
#17No shit Sherlock. Until the end of the year we'll see both NVidia and the hyperscalers that rent their h100s see their revenues already shrinking, there's no way we can have that many companies doing LLMs and being useful.
I have no skin in this game myself, nor do I have any strong opinions one way or the other (though I too have a hard time imagining truly useful LLM-based solutions), but if you're willing to speak with such conviction, I'd like to see your short positions against NVidia et all.
Re: AI products like ChatGPT much hyped but not much used, study says
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have no skin in this game myself, nor do I have any strong opinions one way or the other (though I too have a hard time imagining truly useful LLM-based solutions), but if you're willing to speak with such conviction, I'd like to see your short positions against NVidia et all.
To your last point, I’d like to point out there’s an adage that goes along the lines of “the market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent…”
Re: AI products like ChatGPT much hyped but not much used, study says
#19OK, so I'm neither a developer nor a content creator, and I can't think of anything useful a LLM could do for me. I tried a bit of chat and it was mildly amusing, but not for long. I certainly don't want one of them running my digital life for me. Isn't this just the zombie reincarnation of Clippy?
Mobile phone typing completions are suggested by AI models similar to LLM/ChatGPT, but using older and inferior architectures. These will be replaced with "Large" Language Models where the "Large" is a few hundred megabytes or a gigabyte at most. It'll be noticeably better, but not a "Chat bot".
Assistants like Siri will be completely revamped around text+audio models similar to ChatGPT 4o. It'll be a huge improvement that most people will notice and utilise daily, but it'll feel like a "Siri upgrade" not a new ChatGPT app.
Office apps will get AI assistants that will be like Clippy but actually useful. Excel and similar "more technical" apps especially would be much more useful to a larger group if the app held their hand and converted english queries into formulas for them.
Translation apps of all sorts will go from "usable but a bit meh" to nearly perfect.
Etc...
Re: AI products like ChatGPT much hyped but not much used, study says
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
I doubt there are many acedemic articles or even internet forums comparing and contrasting the thinking of Robert Hughes and Carl Jung. A Google search of "Robert Hughes" "Carl Jung" turns up nothing except "Edward Robert Hughes" the painter. This ability of Opus to take a stab at it is what I find so fascinating. I agree, it's not a thinking reasoning being, but it's a pretty good mimic of one, which makes it more t…
Yes, that's interesting and somewhat amusing. But is it accurate or in any way beneficially worthy of billion dollar valuations??