Live data from Hacker News

Dwarf Fortress starting during apt-get upgrade

askubuntu.com

11–20 of 24 posts

Re: Dwarf Fortress starting during apt-get upgrade

#11
post #8

> Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat. I honestly don't mind this, it makes sense. Comments aren't for extended discussion, so move them to the place that is, e.g. chat. But, it's really it's quite obnoxious when they subsequently delete the chatroom! Internet Archive rescued the top comments[1], but you can't click the button to see all of them. Even so, there is some u…

The room still exists and has all the messages https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/64083/discussion-on-ans...

Your link brings me to a "page not found".

Is it gated by reputation? If so, could you please post the full comments somewhere?

Re: Dwarf Fortress starting during apt-get upgrade

#12
post #8

> Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat. I honestly don't mind this, it makes sense. Comments aren't for extended discussion, so move them to the place that is, e.g. chat. But, it's really it's quite obnoxious when they subsequently delete the chatroom! Internet Archive rescued the top comments[1], but you can't click the button to see all of them. Even so, there is some u…

The room still exists and has all the messages https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/64083/discussion-on-ans...

[deleted]

Re: Dwarf Fortress starting during apt-get upgrade

#13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I actually think StackExchange is quite well designed to optimize for good questions and answers. Such as TFA! But the way they delete chatrooms is off brand. If you want to incentivize people to chat in chat instead of in comments, make sure chat is actually usable. That means not deleting chatrooms after a few days!

Except for that all the good answers are showing their age and there's no realistic mechanism for them to be replaced with newer answers.

Yes, this is a big weakness. Seems tied in large part to not tackling versions as well as they could have done.

Re: Dwarf Fortress starting during apt-get upgrade

#14
post #8

> Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat. I honestly don't mind this, it makes sense. Comments aren't for extended discussion, so move them to the place that is, e.g. chat. But, it's really it's quite obnoxious when they subsequently delete the chatroom! Internet Archive rescued the top comments[1], but you can't click the button to see all of them. Even so, there is some u…

The room still exists and has all the messages https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/64083/discussion-on-ans...

Had no idea that the cast of NG were wookies.

Re: Dwarf Fortress starting during apt-get upgrade

#15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I actually think StackExchange is quite well designed to optimize for good questions and answers. Such as TFA! But the way they delete chatrooms is off brand. If you want to incentivize people to chat in chat instead of in comments, make sure chat is actually usable. That means not deleting chatrooms after a few days!

> I actually think StackExchange is quite well designed to optimize for good questions and answers. There's questions and answers on SE? I thought it was just pop-ups and sidebars? (I'm being mildly sarcastic, but I think this screenshot speaks for itself on the state of SE: https://i.imgur.com/S8slGeT.png )

Honestly as far it goes that looks pretty good to me.

Re: Dwarf Fortress starting during apt-get upgrade

#17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I actually think StackExchange is quite well designed to optimize for good questions and answers. Such as TFA! But the way they delete chatrooms is off brand. If you want to incentivize people to chat in chat instead of in comments, make sure chat is actually usable. That means not deleting chatrooms after a few days!

Except for that all the good answers are showing their age and there's no realistic mechanism for them to be replaced with newer answers.

You mean you do not still want to read jquery answers in 2024?

Re: Dwarf Fortress starting during apt-get upgrade

#18
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I actually think StackExchange is quite well designed to optimize for good questions and answers. Such as TFA! But the way they delete chatrooms is off brand. If you want to incentivize people to chat in chat instead of in comments, make sure chat is actually usable. That means not deleting chatrooms after a few days!

Chatrooms are freezed, not deleted, if there's enough content. The only reason why they are deleted is when there are less than 10 messages or 3 participants (don't quote me on that). Actual rules: > Rooms will exist indefinitely, so long as there is at least one person actively talking in the room. A room is considered worth retaining if it has more than 15 messages by at least 2 users.

[deleted]

Re: Dwarf Fortress starting during apt-get upgrade

#19
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The room still exists and has all the messages https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/64083/discussion-on-ans...

Your link brings me to a "page not found". Is it gated by reputation? If so, could you please post the full comments somewhere?

That or being logged in. It was “not found” for me, too, until I logged in. (I don’t have any rep on the Ubuntu site, aside from the 100 for being on other SE sites).

Re: Dwarf Fortress starting during apt-get upgrade

#20
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Your link brings me to a "page not found". Is it gated by reputation? If so, could you please post the full comments somewhere?

That or being logged in. It was “not found” for me, too, until I logged in. (I don’t have any rep on the Ubuntu site, aside from the 100 for being on other SE sites).

I am logged in and have 191 reputation on Ask Ubuntu.
Post reply on HN