It's hard to find clothing made from natural fibers like organic cotton nowadays
[1] https://www.duckworthco.com/products/mens-vapor-pocket-tee
11–20 of 26 posts
It's hard to find clothing made from natural fibers like organic cotton nowadays
[1] https://www.duckworthco.com/products/mens-vapor-pocket-tee
From the author’s selfie, she doesn’t seem to crave high fashion, so why not shop at thrift stores? The selection is great, clothing is avoiding the landfill, and it’s cheaper than new. I have gotten a fine knock-off pea coat, and a Boston Celtics jacket that might come in handy this playoff season. (I grew up in the Boston area.) And lots more. Most of my clothes are thrift store finds, and many are cotton making a…
> Of course, you can get around production problem by buying used items. I could go to thrift stores and consignment shops and try to find the few things with all natural fibers, and just wear those, and I could learn how to mend and patch them so they don't have to be tossed as they start to wear out, as natural fibers so easily do. > I could do that, but I have not done that. Why not? I could say I've been busy, a…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Of course, you can get around production problem by buying used items. I could go to thrift stores and consignment shops and try to find the few things with all natural fibers, and just wear those, and I could learn how to mend and patch them so they don't have to be tossed as they start to wear out, as natural fibers so easily do. > I could do that, but I have not done that. Why not? I could say I've been busy, a…
The thing about the complaint that natural fibers are ill-fitting is a bit odd. It's true that less stretchy clothing is more forgiving, but it's also true that the ill-fitting aspect is because of the cut, not the fiber. The problem can be easily and (relatively) cheaply fixed by having the garment altered to fit you.
> I can imagine a world in which that is a standard activity that I could engage in, but our world is not that world. Last time I wanted pants made shorter, most places I went wanted me to have pinned them up myself beforehand. I found a place that would do the fitting part, and it took weeks, a couple of follow-up nudge calls, and several trips there to get it all done. Plus, what if I gain or lose a few pounds? Am I going to get things perfectly fitted around my torso then be unable to wear them a month later? Ugh.
This is why the world needs tailors and seamstresses. Someone skilled with a needle can take those clothes in or let them out where they need to be and make them look fantastic.
For a cost, of course. But as the article points out, microplastics are also a cost.
One thing I learned about recently was that clothes now are a single size where clothing from the past had features that allowed changes in weight and size without needing to throw the clothes away. It might be time to look at adjustable clothing styles again, but it would require a fashion change as there isn't much that can be done to a t-shirt to make it "adjustable".
Formal/business attire: tailoring is nice but a military tuck lets a dress shirt conform to the belly you have, not the one (or several) it was patterned on.
Casual, work and streetwear: additional snaps, buttons, and ties are often used to allow the wearer to fit to their body and desired motion. Some brands have a show clear intention, such as having a small pleat or even slit in the pant waist with elastic so that it can be worn high or low at a range of sizes. More commonly, elastic pulls on jackets or athletic pants. Others have give less direction but more options by leaving button holes or grommets so the wearer can create their own shape and hold it.
On the consumer end it is difficult to tell when a garment is designed with any of this in mind or if it's just mindless copying or following trends. Having some minuscule knowledge into the design side I can say that it's a mix of both. Brands which care about it have designers who care and try to research these things to use them strategically; they tend to signal the versatility by readily showing models wearing them in different, sometimes unintended ways. Streetwear is ripe with this because brands often produce less meaning less sizes available and they (and their customers) value the suggested creativity. If you can only make S, M, L or M, L, XL but want 5ft women and 6.5ft men to enjoy them that is a challenge which some designers live for.
In addition, people spent a lot more on clothing than they do now as a percentage of income.
There are also still now plenty of cultures in which clothing isn't intended to hug the body.
I think that the author is basically just finding out that tailoring is for the wealthy unless you learn to do it yourself.
Another guess is that these clothes were designed with gender in mind, e.g. a suit is made to accentuate masculine features. It doesn't sound as if the author is wearing clothing designed for the female silhouette. Nothing wrong with that, but it's like trying to fit a square peg into a round hole. No amount of tailoring is going to make a dress look good on my broad shoulders.
The author is correct on use cases, for a lot of applications, synthetic fibers are the only viable answer. As a drysuit diver with a wool allergy, I cannot avoid synthetic fibers in my undergarments (warm clothes you wear under the drysuit designed to still insulate you long enough to safely exit your dive even if the drysuit fails and is flooded). I have thought about the irony of this as I do cleanup dives to remove larger plastic pieces from the ocean.
99% this was a marketing piece masquerading as a blogpost - see plug at the bottom.
Doesn't read like a submarine article, and the rest of blog seems pretty earnest.
It's hard to find clothing made from natural fibers like organic cotton nowadays