Is finding gaps just hard now? As a 24 yo, everything seems to be done already
11–20 of 49 posts
Re: Is finding gaps just hard now? As a 24 yo, everything seems to be done already
#12Early 2000s it was: just put it online and it will sell, at a time when online businesses were still new.
Paul Graham's Y Combinator was: create a good product and it will sell, at a time when online businesses were these half-assed 2000s era products.
AirBnB/Uber's generation is: get a fuck ton of funding and do mildly illegal shit fast, and then use your funding and lawyers to rewrite the law. So called "disruption".
(I am not going to mention OpenAI and other AI startups because they are a class of their own.)
Re: Is finding gaps just hard now? As a 24 yo, everything seems to be done already
#13There are gaps everywhere , especially in science/research. Consider looking into a Ph.D. if you’re hungry to find, master, and close a gap. Not being sarcastic, btw. The more you know, the more you realize how little you know and how many gaps there are in your field.
I watched a lecture series on the brain and my take away was that we really don't know "how the brain works"
Surprised me how much is unknown compared to say fields like physics/chemistry
Re: Is finding gaps just hard now? As a 24 yo, everything seems to be done already
#14There are gaps everywhere , especially in science/research. Consider looking into a Ph.D. if you’re hungry to find, master, and close a gap. Not being sarcastic, btw. The more you know, the more you realize how little you know and how many gaps there are in your field.
Re: Is finding gaps just hard now? As a 24 yo, everything seems to be done already
#15Spend a decade in any industry and you will see the gaps more clearly.
Re: Is finding gaps just hard now? As a 24 yo, everything seems to be done already
#16OK - a big problem for starters - how to get people off of their screens and focus on something else - like life in general? Given the way digital infrastructure exists as is today, this is a freakishly difficult problem. In other words - how'd you make digital systems all around you "attention-enhancing" rather than "attention-diluting"
Re: Is finding gaps just hard now? As a 24 yo, everything seems to be done already
#17That's how all markets start. Every product or startup needs to start off as a very targeted application because otherwise you will drown in complexity and lack of strategy, but with a forward facing vision on how to expand into adjacent problem spaces.
$TECHNOLOGICAL_APPLICATION for $SPECIFIC_INDUSTRY is always the best method to start building out a product, and expanding from there.
> Is finding gaps just hard now
No.
You might just not be looking hard enough. Try and find specific problems in a domain you are very experienced in.
Also be open to pivot if needed. For example, Slack started off as a chat-app within a failed videogame.
Re: Is finding gaps just hard now? As a 24 yo, everything seems to be done already
#18And that's ignoring all the bits of tech we use every day that could just be a lot better. JVM build systems are a mess, there is a serious need for competition there, to pick just one example that bothers me regularly.
Once you get into the swing of it the problem is not gonna be finding ideas. The problem will be finding ideas that other people will pay for. That's the hardest constraint.
Re: Is finding gaps just hard now? As a 24 yo, everything seems to be done already
#19There are gaps everywhere , especially in science/research. Consider looking into a Ph.D. if you’re hungry to find, master, and close a gap. Not being sarcastic, btw. The more you know, the more you realize how little you know and how many gaps there are in your field.
Do not do this. This is a trap. Research and higher academics are in effect a scam in modern day. At one point they were useful, but now everything done is overwhelmingly private R&D. In academia you will scrounge for scraps and never pay off the loans.
I agree with your sentiment. Academia as a career path isn’t viable (or even feasible) for the majority of people who get a PhD