Bridges (aka "Hashi") is one of my all-time favorite logic puzzles. I recently discovered Galaxies, and I enjoy this one a lot too; I also like Slitherlink (called "Loopy" here) a lot. However this site is missing two that I like quite a bit more, which are Paint by Numbers & Battleships, both of which I originally started doing in Games Magazine and later found on Conceptis Puzzles [0] (they call PbN "Pic-A-Pix") wh…
Simon Tatham's Portable Puzzle Collection
11–20 of 54 posts
Re: Simon Tatham's Portable Puzzle Collection
#12The Android version worked very well when I installed it year ago. It was a great choice for someone who does not want to have addictive games installed in the phone, while at the same time enjoy the occasional brain teaser.
I have to vehemently disagree with you here - the Android version is the main reason why I needed to set a "no phone in the bedroom" rule for myself.
Re: Simon Tatham's Portable Puzzle Collection
#13Re: Simon Tatham's Portable Puzzle Collection
#14Every general purpose Linux desktop I setup gets Simon Tatham's puzzles and all of Kenta Cho's and Jason Rohrer's games.
Jason Rohrer - https://hcsoftware.sourceforge.net/jason-rohrer/
Do distros package these? They should!
Re: Simon Tatham's Portable Puzzle Collection
#15Re: Simon Tatham's Portable Puzzle Collection
#16Every general purpose Linux desktop I setup gets Simon Tatham's puzzles and all of Kenta Cho's and Jason Rohrer's games.
Kenta Cho - https://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~cs8k-cyu/ Jason Rohrer - https://hcsoftware.sourceforge.net/jason-rohrer/ Do distros package these? They should!
Re: Simon Tatham's Portable Puzzle Collection
#17It has the best version of minesweeper, where every board is solvable.
https://pwmarcz.pl/blog/kaboom/
Previous discussion on HackerNews:
Re: Simon Tatham's Portable Puzzle Collection
#18A lot of the time solving loopy involves noticing re-usable patterns. But how do you know a possible pattern is re-usable? Well, you can prove it, such as with notions from graph theory.
The construction vs discovery aspect could be approached in a couple of ways. On the one hand, the loop that you are "discovering" is really only induced by the underlying solutions which the computer has already "constructed." On the other hand, the computer only created the hidden solution using mathematics which was discovered.
And on the other other hand, the mathematics which we "discover" is arguably induced by the ZFC etc axioms which we have constructed because of their ability to model consistent reasoning. Other sets of axioms, lacking the flexibility or consistency which we expect from our mathematical models, were discarded, yet would induce different mathematical systems capable of discovery.
And the nesting of construction and discovery into each other could continue even deeper ...
Re: Simon Tatham's Portable Puzzle Collection
#19Today, with reliable Internet on my phone, I could instead scroll Fediverse or something, but I figure blazing through puzzles using rules I've learned is more meditative.
Re: Simon Tatham's Portable Puzzle Collection
#20It has the best version of minesweeper, where every board is solvable.
You can also swap primary and secondary clicks (at least in the Android version), which makes it the fastest on touchscreens as well.