Highest paid QA in the world
Mark makes $1 a year. Now if we count his dividends sure, but I wouldnt say that those are payment for his work since he'd get them if he was working or not.
No longer true.
Mark Zuckerberg himself appears in the list of direct contributors to Llama 3
11–20 of 21 posts
Re: Mark Zuckerberg himself appears in the list of direct contributors to Llama 3
#12[deleted]
Re: Mark Zuckerberg himself appears in the list of direct contributors to Llama 3
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
Mark makes $1 a year. Now if we count his dividends sure, but I wouldnt say that those are payment for his work since he'd get them if he was working or not.
No longer true.
Assertions without cite[1; pp. 62 and 68] are less meaningful than Zuck's base salary.
[1] https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1326801/000132680124...
Re: Mark Zuckerberg himself appears in the list of direct contributors to Llama 3
#14Earlier quoted context omitted.
Mark makes $1 a year. Now if we count his dividends sure, but I wouldnt say that those are payment for his work since he'd get them if he was working or not.
No longer true.
Meta pays for his security and he uses the companies pj but he doesnt take a salary and hasnt received stocks for a decade.
Re: Mark Zuckerberg himself appears in the list of direct contributors to Llama 3
#15Re: Mark Zuckerberg himself appears in the list of direct contributors to Llama 3
#16Re: Mark Zuckerberg himself appears in the list of direct contributors to Llama 3
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
No longer true.
Assertions without cite[1; pp. 62 and 68] are less meaningful than Zuck's base salary. [1] https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1326801/000132680124...
His base salary was $1. But his total compensation was around $23 million which includes his fringe benefits like personal security, private jet, health insurance, etc.
Re: Mark Zuckerberg himself appears in the list of direct contributors to Llama 3
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
Assertions without cite[1; pp. 62 and 68] are less meaningful than Zuck's base salary. [1] https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1326801/000132680124...
His base salary was $1. But his total compensation was around $23 million which includes his fringe benefits like personal security, private jet, health insurance, etc.
At the end of the day he still owns 13.5% of the company on paper. Any listed compensation was already ~1/8ths his.
Re: Mark Zuckerberg himself appears in the list of direct contributors to Llama 3
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
Assertions without cite[1; pp. 62 and 68] are less meaningful than Zuck's base salary. [1] https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1326801/000132680124...
His base salary was $1. But his total compensation was around $23 million which includes his fringe benefits like personal security, private jet, health insurance, etc.
That's ~$24.4 million in explicit fringe benefits allocated by Meta's board; it's not like Zuck is willy-nilly exchanging family security allowance for Gucci bags.
To the GP's original remark, Meta paid out a quarterly dividend of $0.50/share a few weeks ago[1]...I'm sure you can ballpark what Zuck's cut of that was. When you do, square that notional figure against the limited use total comp above and tell us why the latter even matters.
[1] https://investor.fb.com/investor-news/press-release-details/...
Re: Mark Zuckerberg himself appears in the list of direct contributors to Llama 3
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
Meta pays for his security and he uses the companies pj but he doesnt take a salary and hasnt received stocks for a decade.
He uses the company's what? Pajamas?
I never quite understand why people use ambiguous or uncommon abbreviations in comments. In this case I'm pretty sure they were talking about private jets (because it was spelled out in another comment), but I can't image most persons talk THAT much about private jets that they are used to that abbreviation.