[flagged]
Mayakovsky in Cleveland (2023)
11–18 of 18 posts
Re: Mayakovsky in Cleveland (2023)
#12[flagged]
Re: Mayakovsky in Cleveland (2023)
#13[flagged]
One of the biggest shock for me was a few years ago I saw pictures of a protest in Portland and the people were waving the Soviet flag around. I thought, sure this is political satire and trying to make a point, then I was explained that those people are dead serious.
Re: Mayakovsky in Cleveland (2023)
#14Re: Mayakovsky in Cleveland (2023)
#15[flagged]
Different from the Nazis in Germany.
Re: Mayakovsky in Cleveland (2023)
#16[flagged]
Also a prominent futurist and a self-proclaimed proletarian poet. Historical figures such as Mayakovsky shouldn't be perceived as black or white.
By 1925, it still wasn't obvious that Soviet Regime would become what we know about it now. NEP period had something to be excited about in terms of economic development and political/personal freedoms (as opposed to dekulakization and related changes, which happened in the late 20s).
Re: Mayakovsky in Cleveland (2023)
#17[flagged]
The people leading the Russian revolution of 1917, genuinely believed that it will make the world (and not just Russia) a better place for all humans. Different from the Nazis in Germany.
Re: Mayakovsky in Cleveland (2023)
#18Along with an interesting story, the Russian-language flyer has fascinating Runglish words, phrasing and grammar. "Кливланд" (Cleveland) is spelled with "а" at the end, which makes the pronunciation "Cleev-lahnd". The modern version is "Кливленд", which is pronounced almost the same as English. "Мувис" is just transliterated "Movies". I suppose the movies were new enough that the current words "кино(театр)" (kino(the…
But it may be an urban legend.
Upd: sometime this "legend" says that after the spelling reform of 1918 the ъ at the end of words was banned, this letter was forced to be removed from typewriter as well (though it may be used in a middle of words). The article on this reform in Russian Wikipedia mentions, that for the same reason ъ was seized from typographies to restrict its usage. In both cases an apostrophe was used instead. It seems these facts are consistent with each other and this particular usage of the apostrophe.