Why do people even submit nytimes links when the article is completely unavailable? Can anyone actually read it or are we just supposed to debate about a vague headline?
The A.C.L.U. Said a Worker Used Racist Tropes and Fired Her. But Did She?
11–15 of 15 posts
Re: The A.C.L.U. Said a Worker Used Racist Tropes and Fired Her. But Did She?
#12Why do people even submit nytimes links when the article is completely unavailable? Can anyone actually read it or are we just supposed to debate about a vague headline?
(Three people have already posted comments with links to archived copies of this article.)
Re: The A.C.L.U. Said a Worker Used Racist Tropes and Fired Her. But Did She?
#13Re: The A.C.L.U. Said a Worker Used Racist Tropes and Fired Her. But Did She?
#14Is this really the strongest evidence the ACLU found to justify the claim of "racism"? This entire case sounds like a right-wing parody of a left-wing workplace and "oppression Olympics". > The A.C.L.U. acknowledges that Ms. Oh, who is Korean American, never used any kind of racial slur. But the group says that her use of certain phrases and words demonstrated a pattern of willful anti-Black animus. > In one instance…
It's definitely happening in other organizations: https://theintercept.com/2022/06/13/progressive-organizing-i....