11–20 of 65 posts
The paper lists "first authors", "core authors", and "senior authors". My dream is to one day be listed on a seminal paper as "secondary forum reply author".
This looks competitive against CLIP, and surprisingly great at VQA style prompts, but it doesn't seem like the paper supports comparing it to GPT-4. We don't see any tests for coding performance, math homework, legal document review, or any of the myriad other things that people use GPT-4 for on a daily basis.
Besides homework, all of these things seem to be professional uses of GPT-4. If they’re trying to bake this into a consumer platform like Siri, I don’t see why they’d need to focus on those use cases. Besides MDM/Enterprise, which will be curious if they try and attack this market or just their army of consumer devices.
MM1 is a research paper, not a release of a competing product. I'm sure the paper is interesting and am looking forward to reading an analysis of it by someone who understands these things better than I do, but this is not that analysis, it's an extremely low-effort puff piece that is more interested in getting attention than in accurately describing a research paper. I don't usually say this, but TFA frankly feels l…
I believe most run-of-the-mill marketing language will sound like it is written in AI. The easiest thing to do for technology writing is to write the complete, factual article, then ask an LLM to dumb it down to whatever level you need for communication.
The paper lists "first authors", "core authors", and "senior authors". My dream is to one day be listed on a seminal paper as "secondary forum reply author".
Similarly, I’d like the movie credit Second Assistant to the Second Second Assistant Director.
I recall that my undergrad institution once invented a new deanship out of whole cloth for a coach who'd maxed out on the "professor" pay scale.
Even worse, the bastard didn't even win games!
I wonder if this has anything to do with their acquisition of DarwinAI. After a decade of mediocrity, I'd love to see Siri get smarter. Any improvement would be welcome at this point.
I wonder if this has anything to do with their acquisition of DarwinAI. After a decade of mediocrity, I'd love to see Siri get smarter. Any improvement would be welcome at this point.
I wonder if this has anything to do with their acquisition of DarwinAI. After a decade of mediocrity, I'd love to see Siri get smarter. Any improvement would be welcome at this point.
I wonder if this has anything to do with their acquisition of DarwinAI. After a decade of mediocrity, I'd love to see Siri get smarter. Any improvement would be welcome at this point.
Maybe I find conversational UIs awkward, or maybe I just got jaded REALLY quickly from Siri’s lacking capabilities early on, but I have hardly used it in the decade or whatever that it’s been around.
I wonder if this has anything to do with their acquisition of DarwinAI. After a decade of mediocrity, I'd love to see Siri get smarter. Any improvement would be welcome at this point.
Honest question: what do you (in the general sense, not specifically asking the parent) use Siri for? I think my main (only?) use case is setting a timer. Maybe I find conversational UIs awkward, or maybe I just got jaded REALLY quickly from Siri’s lacking capabilities early on, but I have hardly used it in the decade or whatever that it’s been around.
I outsource so much of my memory to the phone via Siri ALL THE TIME. It’s so useful. Even for things in 20m. I’ll easily forget if I don’t do this, and it’s reliable so it gives me confidence. It also keeps the notification present until I actually do the thing, so I have a kind of string around my finger until the task is accomplished. I can also snooze that notification as needed to rebring it up at the right time.
Every time I do this around non-tech people they go “wow I didn’t know you could do that.” I swear it’s literally life changing, particularly for anyone over 30.