What I don't get is why people are not using seatbelts. The only time I'm not using it is when I'm on the way to and from the bathroom. If I'm seated I'm using the seatbelt.
Latam Airlines SYD to AKL flight: 50 people treated after mid-air incident
11–20 of 158 posts
Re: Latam Airlines SYD to AKL flight: 50 people treated after mid-air incident
#12What I don't get is why people are not using seatbelts. The only time I'm not using it is when I'm on the way to and from the bathroom. If I'm seated I'm using the seatbelt.
My god could you imagine if this happened when you were in the bathroom?
Re: Latam Airlines SYD to AKL flight: 50 people treated after mid-air incident
#13https://www.cnn.com/2012/04/17/travel/canada-disoriented-pil...
Re: Latam Airlines SYD to AKL flight: 50 people treated after mid-air incident
#14> Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner
(Boeing, but not the 737 Max that has been in the headlines the past few years)
Source: https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2024/3/11/50-people-injur...
Re: Latam Airlines SYD to AKL flight: 50 people treated after mid-air incident
#15Re: Latam Airlines SYD to AKL flight: 50 people treated after mid-air incident
#16What I don't get is why people are not using seatbelts. The only time I'm not using it is when I'm on the way to and from the bathroom. If I'm seated I'm using the seatbelt.
Re: Latam Airlines SYD to AKL flight: 50 people treated after mid-air incident
#17Not turbulence related. Plane (Boeing 787-9) lost instrumentation according to the captain, followed by rapid loss of altitude. When instrumentation came back, flight continued to a safe landing. 12 people were sent to hospital. S always, see avherald.com for the most reliable, non-speculative info.
Re: Latam Airlines SYD to AKL flight: 50 people treated after mid-air incident
#18Not turbulence related. Plane (Boeing 787-9) lost instrumentation according to the captain, followed by rapid loss of altitude. When instrumentation came back, flight continued to a safe landing. 12 people were sent to hospital. S always, see avherald.com for the most reliable, non-speculative info.
Re: Latam Airlines SYD to AKL flight: 50 people treated after mid-air incident
#19The plane transited from an air stream (of whatever velocity/vector) into one descending vertically at high speed = instant down elevator = passengers in free fall as plane descends = impact roof hard/soft. Soon exit the stream and get used to it = fall down hard from 7-8 feet in random attitude. Down is the worst, a vertical up = pressed into seat and already standing. Pilot might have had a warning or inkling = fas…
Thanks for providing your perspective - Why don't we hear about these as often? Is there tech to avoid these air pockets? Was there some kind of negligence involved or should I be more cautious on planes about leaving my loose belongings lying around?
Re: Latam Airlines SYD to AKL flight: 50 people treated after mid-air incident
#20What I don't get is why people are not using seatbelts. The only time I'm not using it is when I'm on the way to and from the bathroom. If I'm seated I'm using the seatbelt.
The terrible UX doesn't help. There is a seatbelt icon on the sign, they announce it as "fasten seatbelt sign", which makes it sound like when it is off you don't have to have it fastened. But it really should be "remain seated" sign.
Also some people don't wear seatbelts in cars as some idiotic macho thing. I assume there is no helping those.