On mobile and can’t read the rest of the paper, the impact could be massive.
Seaborn bug responsible for finding of declining disruptiveness in science
11–20 of 77 posts
Re: Seaborn bug responsible for finding of declining disruptiveness in science
#12The graphing library caused this?
Re: Seaborn bug responsible for finding of declining disruptiveness in science
#13Re: Seaborn bug responsible for finding of declining disruptiveness in science
#14The graphing library caused this?
Re: Seaborn bug responsible for finding of declining disruptiveness in science
#15Like others, expecting a wildy different article...
Re: Seaborn bug responsible for finding of declining disruptiveness in science
#16Re: Seaborn bug responsible for finding of declining disruptiveness in science
#17Seaborn is a visualization library. No statistical tests should have been done with seaborn as an intermediate processing step. I guess they used some of the convenience functions as part of the data analysis. Seaborn is a final step tool, not a data analysis tool. That's an embarrassing lesson to learn post-publication.
Re: Seaborn bug responsible for finding of declining disruptiveness in science
#18Seaborn??? Typo surely Edit: Not mentioned in the abstract but it is in the main paper. Editorialised title.
It's referring to the seaborn library ( https://seaborn.pydata.org/ ), a Python library for data visualization (built on top of matplotlib).
Re: Seaborn bug responsible for finding of declining disruptiveness in science
#19Bizarre. How do people make such big, splashy findings that can mess with people’s sense of optimism about science and innovation, without doing the simplest types of checks on their data and methodology.