Live data from Hacker News

Fighting Infomania: Why 80% of Your Reading Is a Waste of Time (2016)

nateliason.com

11–20 of 106 posts

Re: Fighting Infomania: Why 80% of Your Reading Is a Waste of Time (2016)

#11

I'm going to repeat a comment I made a few weeks ago: George Dyson has what I found to be an enlightening metaphor for how our relationship with information has changed. It is repeated here: https://edu.blogs.com/edublogs/2010/01/george-dyson-media-li ...

Working link: https://edu.blogs.com/edublogs/2010/01/george-dyson-media-li...

Re: Fighting Infomania: Why 80% of Your Reading Is a Waste of Time (2016)

#13
I completely disagree with the article’s core premise. I have read voraciously for my entire life since I was a little kid. Maybe much of it wasted, yet tidbits of knowledge I have gained over the years of reading come up constantly, and give me a bit of a leg up in conversations.

HN is a big part of that, I can read about a wide array of technologies and processes and science that I normally would never encounter. And without fail, some number of those topics will come up in work conversations and I can speak somewhat intelligently on the topic.

The same is true even for fiction. Having read some semi-obscure book long ago may be a connection I have with a new acquaintance.

Again, a lot of it is wasted, it there’s no way to know exactly which bits will never come up, and which will.

Re: Fighting Infomania: Why 80% of Your Reading Is a Waste of Time (2016)

#14
post #9

Read “infomania” as insomnia and skimmed the whole damn thing (or 80% if it) before figuring out this didn’t have the cure for insomnia (unless it’s caused by infomania, which is plausible).

I did the same, thinking it was an article about how reading late at night isn't retained or something.

Re: Fighting Infomania: Why 80% of Your Reading Is a Waste of Time (2016)

#15
I snagged a cheap bench press and squat rack and a huge set of weights on Craigslist. I decided I would get back into a basic lifting routine I did in high school and asked some friends who do that. I quickly was engulfed with endless articles and information.

I have decided to eschew any learning and stick with "Me big caveman. lift big rock get stronger" approach and it's working fine. Taking it easy, enjoying it, and not worrying too much about anything else.

It's more refreshing to REFUSE information than to consume it.

"Thats a whole lotta words, to bad I ain't reading them"

Re: Fighting Infomania: Why 80% of Your Reading Is a Waste of Time (2016)

#16
I think this is a shallow article.

First, just in time manufacturing has the noted weakness of having no slack or resilience in the system. This is part of why we experienced supply chain disruption during the pandemic.

Second, it is assuming that knowledge that's not being 'used' right now in production environment is useless.

For example, the way people avoid scam and snake-oil medicine is not by directly knowing every single piece of science but having a broad knowledge enough of the world to know that it's probably scammy. I don't need to know much about virology to understand that drinking bleach is probably a bad idea for fighting viral infection.

Third, most of what he's going to read is probably not real knowledge, or difficult to obtain unless experienced or acquired directly. Some things you can only learn via doing. Some things you can only learn through systemized research. How many of these books about entrepeneurship only apply to their specific situation, or specific context? How many are simply scam?

What I think is helpful, however, is to cultivate curiosity about the world, in all things that you can. It's probably helpful to your career if you focus your curiosity on specific things you need to do, but that's not the only thing worth learning. I think I want to focus on things that make me a better engineer and build a successful business, so maybe 60-70% for that, and the rest for play and passion and just love of learning.

Edit: added a missing no as pointed out by someone.

Re: Fighting Infomania: Why 80% of Your Reading Is a Waste of Time (2016)

#17
post #12

Reminds me of my own approach of RINORIN (read it now or read it never) which I've written about on HN before and led me to cancel all my RIL app subscriptions and create https://notado.app for my own personal needs instead.

I leave up articles for days hoping I'll read them, they pile up in my tabs— wasting so much memory. A lot of pc memory is wasted from just this on my end and I know I'm not the only one.

It's interesting to think about how much wasted energy comes from tabs you're leaving open, hoping you'll get back to them one day.

Re: Fighting Infomania: Why 80% of Your Reading Is a Waste of Time (2016)

#18
I've been struggling to read nonfiction lately because so much of the content seems to be rehashed from other sources and leans heavily into persuasion of some greater point that gets bashed into your brain for 400 pages. It's like every book copied Malcolm Gladwell's style and it's too much for me. Am I just reading the wrong books?

Re: Fighting Infomania: Why 80% of Your Reading Is a Waste of Time (2016)

#19

This is extremely weird because today I was reading about how the US military is upping its logistics power in asia to counter China invading Taiwan. And the phrase they used was a shift from “just in time” logistics to “just in case” logistics. So this is the first time I’m seeing this phrase and now this article uses it again. https://www.reuters.com/world/china/logistics-war-how-washin...

If you have read anything about logistics in the last few year, you would have realized that shifting everything to a just in time logistics is probably a bad idea in case of disruption. It's a spectrum, and it shows by analogy why you want a broad range of knowledge, not just hyper focused on your career.

Re: Fighting Infomania: Why 80% of Your Reading Is a Waste of Time (2016)

#20
There's a fundamental challenge in simply not knowing at the reading point in time whether this knowledge will be valuable in the future.

The reason read-it-later apps exist is because we want to buy the insurance policy that IF there is a future situation in which the information is useful, we have it saved somewhere to access it.

The reality is, even if you have saved it at some point, there's no guarantee you'll be able to remember the knowledge when you need it.

This is precisely the problem I'm building a solution for.

Post reply on HN