Microsoft actions following attack by nation state actor Midnight Blizzard
11–20 of 204 posts
Re: Microsoft actions following attack by nation state actor Midnight Blizzard
#12What does the title mean?
Re: Microsoft actions following attack by nation state actor Midnight Blizzard
#13Why does the data security industry seem to be so into obfuscated jargon? It’s like a new industry microcosm corporatespeak. It’s ok to call them countries, hackers, and intrusions. Microsoft got hacked by Russian government hackers.
[0] https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/security/int...
Re: Microsoft actions following attack by nation state actor Midnight Blizzard
#14Why does the data security industry seem to be so into obfuscated jargon? It’s like a new industry microcosm corporatespeak. It’s ok to call them countries, hackers, and intrusions. Microsoft got hacked by Russian government hackers.
Re: Microsoft actions following attack by nation state actor Midnight Blizzard
#15> access a very small percentage of Microsoft corporate email accounts Ok, so far so good. > including members of our senior leadership team Ahhh, so maybe the attackers were after the senior leadership team and therefore stopped at the "very small percentage".
Re: Microsoft actions following attack by nation state actor Midnight Blizzard
#16Why does the data security industry seem to be so into obfuscated jargon? It’s like a new industry microcosm corporatespeak. It’s ok to call them countries, hackers, and intrusions. Microsoft got hacked by Russian government hackers.
At least for the "Midnight Blizzard" part of the title, it's the result of a naming framework [0] for threat actors that Microsoft has been using since April 2023. I agree it sounds weird. [0] https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/security/int...
They all sound like bad translations to bargain-bin porno movies.
Re: Microsoft actions following attack by nation state actor Midnight Blizzard
#17Why does the data security industry seem to be so into obfuscated jargon? It’s like a new industry microcosm corporatespeak. It’s ok to call them countries, hackers, and intrusions. Microsoft got hacked by Russian government hackers.
> It’s ok to call them countries, hackers, and intrusions. It's not if you want to do business in that country. Or if you annoy allies of that country (accusing certain countries might get senators breathing down your neck!). You are accusing a government of committing a crime, or at least a wildly unethical behavior. Those are huge charges. To your point, I wish they could be more direct, but... > Microsoft got hack…
Coming from Russia, that's a distinction without a difference.
Sure, private groups can 'freelance', but not without at least tacit permission from the FSB, GRU, and/or SVR (more accurately, cant freelance for long). Especially so for sch a high visibility target such as Microsoft.
And when the RU govt isdues a denial, it's confirmed.
But still no reason for MS to escalate the wording. They put enough in there that anyone with a clue knows it's serious.
Re: Microsoft actions following attack by nation state actor Midnight Blizzard
#18What does the title mean?
Re: Microsoft actions following attack by nation state actor Midnight Blizzard
#19If they had top leadership accounts and service accounts hacked just by password protection sounds like a major security fubar.
Re: Microsoft actions following attack by nation state actor Midnight Blizzard
#20Why does the data security industry seem to be so into obfuscated jargon? It’s like a new industry microcosm corporatespeak. It’s ok to call them countries, hackers, and intrusions. Microsoft got hacked by Russian government hackers.
Going back to my example with taxonomies: Yeah, you got bit by a spider, but exactly which kind of spider bit you? What do we know about those kinds of spiders, e.g. are they known for being venomous or not, does their bite have a well-known reaction in humans, etc.