If there is one company that could give accurate stats on what drives actually perform better and what drives are the worst and fail more often it is Black Blaze, but yet they don't. What a missed opportunity to provide some insight.
The drive stats of Backblaze storage pods
11–20 of 158 posts
Re: The drive stats of Backblaze storage pods
#12If there is one company that could give accurate stats on what drives actually perform better and what drives are the worst and fail more often it is Black Blaze, but yet they don't. What a missed opportunity to provide some insight.
My bad!!
Re: The drive stats of Backblaze storage pods
#13If there is one company that could give accurate stats on what drives actually perform better and what drives are the worst and fail more often it is Black Blaze, but yet they don't. What a missed opportunity to provide some insight.
Like this? https://www.backblaze.com/blog/backblaze-drive-stats-for-q2-...
Re: The drive stats of Backblaze storage pods
#14If there is one company that could give accurate stats on what drives actually perform better and what drives are the worst and fail more often it is Black Blaze, but yet they don't. What a missed opportunity to provide some insight.
No.... I take it back, I am a fool! They do publish the stats!! https://www.backblaze.com/blog/backblaze-drive-stats-for-q3-... My bad!!
Re: The drive stats of Backblaze storage pods
#15Is there any information what lead to Backblaze to stop making their own hardware and going with COTS?
Re: The drive stats of Backblaze storage pods
#16If there is one company that could give accurate stats on what drives actually perform better and what drives are the worst and fail more often it is Black Blaze, but yet they don't. What a missed opportunity to provide some insight.
No.... I take it back, I am a fool! They do publish the stats!! https://www.backblaze.com/blog/backblaze-drive-stats-for-q3-... My bad!!
Re: The drive stats of Backblaze storage pods
#17I love these so I'm really sad to say this: What's missing is an AFR based on deployed time in increments, not total time. For example: there should be a sliding window (or a histogram) relating to AFR after deployment for a time frame. IE: AFR between 0-300 days, AFR between 301-600 days, AFR between 601-900 days (etc). Otherwise we're looking at failures historically for the entire period, which might hide a spat o…
The HDD afr is under 2% for the first 3.5 years. Due to factory testing, 'the bathtub now has no left side, which makes it hard to take a bath'. https://i.gzn.jp/img/2021/12/21/black-blaze-how-long-disk-dr...
Re: The drive stats of Backblaze storage pods
#18However, we were having 1 outage per month with B2, and in the middle of 2023 we decided to go back to AWS and only use S3 for replication.
We still monitor both services simultaneously (S3 and B2), and every other month we are still having an episode where the latency rises from 15ms to something like 25 seconds for each write/read operation.
Re: The drive stats of Backblaze storage pods
#19If there is one company that could give accurate stats on what drives actually perform better and what drives are the worst and fail more often it is Black Blaze, but yet they don't. What a missed opportunity to provide some insight.
No.... I take it back, I am a fool! They do publish the stats!! https://www.backblaze.com/blog/backblaze-drive-stats-for-q3-... My bad!!