Going to have to xerox this for my wall.
Don't Say Velcro (2017)
11–20 of 175 posts
Re: Don't Say Velcro (2017)
#12Reminds me of the dark ages, when Xerox was so dominant in the copier market that people used their brand as a noun and a verb. They were threatened with loss of their trademark, because it had become so generic. So they had a massive publicity campaign, asking people to say "copy" instead of "xerox". Is this a uniquely US thing? In the UK, people always say "hoover" instead of "vacuum".
No, in Russia people have been xerring documents since photocopiers appeared there.
Re: Don't Say Velcro (2017)
#13Cute attempt, but Velcro/velcro has already been genericised for decades at this point. Nobody's going to move (back?) to "hook-and-loop," especially when the alternative rolls off the tongue a lot better.
Re: Don't Say Velcro (2017)
#14Re: Don't Say Velcro (2017)
#15So, you can either try to change what's in the vocabulary of 300 million people for generations. Or change your brand name. They chose the first. Interesting.
I get it, but still, that's the law for you. The most of us will still say Velcro because it's what we all know it as.
Related: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_generic_and_genericize...
Re: Don't Say Velcro (2017)
#16Re: Don't Say Velcro (2017)
#17Re: Don't Say Velcro (2017)
#18This must be a page for VELCRO®’s lawyers to point to during relevant lawsuits because the argument otherwise seems like a lost cause.
Re: Don't Say Velcro (2017)
#19They're trying to avoid genericide. I think if they didn't do this, they could actually lose the trademark.