Obviously a terrific idea for filtering out the riffraf: «We love your initiative, Linus Torvalds…» … but you need to improve.
Grading job candidates via Github API
11–20 of 35 posts
Re: Grading job candidates via Github API
#12[deleted]
If I'm scoring 33% higher than dhh, something is wrong with your algorithm. http://cl.ly/0k3U0b3h3e2F3S1V0405
My bad
Re: Grading job candidates via Github API
#13Obviously a terrific idea for filtering out the riffraf: «We love your initiative, Linus Torvalds…» … but you need to improve.
yeah, It's not clear to me what their criteria could possibly be. Their own employees seemed to have scored decently well, while heavy weights did terrible. I didn't even make their first tier at < 10k
Re: Grading job candidates via Github API
#14Obviously a terrific idea for filtering out the riffraf: «We love your initiative, Linus Torvalds…» … but you need to improve.
yeah, It's not clear to me what their criteria could possibly be. Their own employees seemed to have scored decently well, while heavy weights did terrible. I didn't even make their first tier at < 10k
Re: Grading job candidates via Github API
#15A few examples of engineering qualities which seem to be either looked over or not respected on this board include...
- Estimation Skills (can the candidate estimate their own abilities and identify pitfalls in the upcoming tasks?)
- Documentation Skills (including diagramming, white boarding, etc)
- Communication Skills (can the candidate communicate to the recipient on the level which is required?)
- Systems Integrations concepts/experience
- Systems Performance concepts/experience
- Personality (e.g. can the candidate accept that their proposed solution is not the best in the room and go on to implement another proposal)
- Politics (can the candidate navigate the politics inherent in an IT organization or are they always burdened by conflict)
In my experience anyone can learn to code, and most people can put together an application, but to become a great performer in any IT organization, the soft-skills are even more important than the coding skills.
Re: Grading job candidates via Github API
#16As for companies that would consider such a thing, what happens if someone does not, will not, or can not commit their work to Github?
Should I just commit stuff to Github just so I can say I did?
Re: Grading job candidates via Github API
#17Is this a joke? It doesn't seem very serious. As for companies that would consider such a thing, what happens if someone does not, will not, or can not commit their work to Github? Should I just commit stuff to Github just so I can say I did?
Re: Grading job candidates via Github API
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
And sadly, that score will keep some people from applying for a job/internship they would be qualified for.
If you don't use github actively, everyone is free to get in touch via jobs@divio.ch - in that case, attach something else to show you are qualified :)
I can't count how many times I've seen posts on www.reddit.com/r/cscareerquestions asking about being ready for a job after graduating or saying they feel like a fraud. If somebody did have imposter syndrome and saw that, it would most likely re-affirm their feelings. Especially after seeing the scores of others on the leader board.
Re: Grading job candidates via Github API
#19Obviously a terrific idea for filtering out the riffraf: «We love your initiative, Linus Torvalds…» … but you need to improve.
They seem to favor python users.
What I would love to see is something that gives you an overall sense of your contributions regardless of language. Pull requests made/accepted, total projects contributed to, number of different languages for code checked in etc.
Re: Grading job candidates via Github API
#20https://www.divio.ch/github/u/dhh/
Welp. Huh. Looks like the creator of Rails isn't getting an internship.