Might come handy when you wanna try out that approach https://www.hillchart.co/
Making OKRs more playful using hill charts
11–20 of 71 posts
Re: Making OKRs more playful using hill charts
#12I really don’t understand people who are interested in things like OKRs.
Re: Making OKRs more playful using hill charts
#13Sure, OKR's can help keep multiple teams aligned on business and product goals. And that's an advantage that's too big to ignore. But the problem with OKR's is too often, they're handed down by well meaning people multiple levels removed from the day to day software development work. There can be a lack of ground truth. But too often they miss the bottom-up intelligence, creativity, and engineering needs that comes f…
The second-biggest problem is that the time horizons of OKRs are often longer than the interval between pivots that cause the old OKRs to no longer make sense.
Re: Making OKRs more playful using hill charts
#14we must imagine Sisyphus happy...
Re: Making OKRs more playful using hill charts
#15I really don’t understand people who are interested in things like OKRs.
Ever hear someone complain about big company bureaucracy? The bigger an organization gets, the more impossible it gets to manage it and keep people aligned towards effective and compounding goals. OKRs promise to help improve that impossible process. I'm not surprised at all that people are interested.
I think a new thing is needed at least for smaller teams. Something like adaptive goals. Roadmap a year, vaguely and plan the next 6 weeks. Measure stuff where it makes sense but not everything needs a measure (or things that don’t might be 0 or 1). Plan based on velocity that takes into account that you wont have planned everything.
Measures are useful but also bullshit. There is no correlation between the measure and business success without intelligence. Even revenue is not a measure of success (I could sell half price bitcoins and have a lot of revenue!)
Re: Making OKRs more playful using hill charts
#16"Here comes the airplane!" is a little game that I like to play with PMs so they get to enjoy me punching them in the face. Aren't we all having fun now, how wonderful!
Re: Making OKRs more playful using hill charts
#17A while back I did build a free & privacy friendly hillchart webapp. (No login) Might come handy when you wanna try out that approach https://www.hillchart.co/
Re: Making OKRs more playful using hill charts
#18If you're big enough to have company level OKRs that were written solely by folks that haven't opened a text editor in 10 years simply get out the popcorn and a can of beer. There are going to be some hilarious ones in there.
Re: Making OKRs more playful using hill charts
#19When ive been introduced to okr Ive really liked this concept to the point that i started to use them in my private life But on the other hand i dont fully like them in my work life First my job forces OKRs amount and treats them equally So OKR like completing half day training and sharing the learnings has the same value as multi month engineering effort.
I think that completing a training or sharing the results are, technically speaking, deliverables not results; that's why that doesn't work as a OKR. OKR would ask for the measurable impact that completing those things has on business behavior (user-facing KPIs, or internal productivity / value measures). My only encounter with OKRs sucked badly, and mismatches like that were one of the reasons.
Some technical skills increase or personal development objective
And that completion of training or certs is what is measured
Re: Making OKRs more playful using hill charts
#20I really don’t understand people who are interested in things like OKRs.
Some people are self motivated and well organized, are great at communicating progress proactively to other stakeholders, an understand the idea of cross departmental alignment. OKRs will not help them.
For everyone else, OKRs are a tool that can help accomplish those things.
PS I actually like OKRs and after a lot of effort, learned how to make them useful. I did not get it at first either.